[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":192},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-14-en":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":6,"document":7},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",14,"Acacia redolens",{"schema_version":8,"language":9,"id":5,"taxonomy":10,"display_name":6,"family_display":12,"genus_display":13,"description":14,"tolerance_evidence":100,"database_records":142,"sources":158},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","en",{"original_scientific_name":6,"accepted_name":11,"family":12,"genus":13},"Acacia redolens Maslin","Fabaceae","Acacia",{"summary":15,"sections":16},"Acacia redolens occurs at Western Australian salt-lake margins and on mildly saline or alkaline soils. Craig et al. compared seedlings from different saltland provenances and reported source-soil ECe, irrigation-water ECw, survival and biomass separately.",[17,27,38,46,59,67,84,92],{"id":18,"title":19,"paragraphs":20},"s01","Overview",[21],{"id":22,"text":15,"source_ids":23,"claim_type":26},"s01-p01",[24,25],"S2","S4","project_synthesis",{"id":28,"title":29,"paragraphs":30},"s02","Names and classification",[31],{"id":32,"text":33,"source_ids":34,"claim_type":37},"s02-p01","Acacia redolens Maslin. The native-range material includes populations on salt-lake margins and on mildly saline or alkaline soils. The experiment separately identified higher- and lower-salinity seed sources, including Ravensthorpe.",[35,24,25,36],"S1","S5","source_fact",{"id":39,"title":40,"paragraphs":41},"s03","Morphology and identification",[42],{"id":43,"text":44,"source_ids":45,"claim_type":37},"s03-p01","This Western Australian species is a prostrate to low shrub with flattened phyllodes, yellow spherical flower heads and flat pods. Phyllode form, venation, inflorescences and pods help distinguish similar wattles in the field; salinity-response differences among provenances are not taxonomic characters.",[24,25],{"id":47,"title":48,"paragraphs":49},"s04","Distribution, habitat and phenology",[50,54],{"id":51,"text":52,"source_ids":53,"claim_type":37},"s04-p01","Flora-derived Wattle records place the species on mildly saline or alkaline loams, clays and clay loams, often at salt-lake margins. Craig et al. also compared seed sources from differently saline Ravensthorpe sites.",[35,24,25,36],{"id":55,"text":56,"source_ids":57,"claim_type":58},"s04-p02","The regional sources cited here do not report a consistent flowering or fruiting season.",[36],"evidence_gap",{"id":60,"title":61,"paragraphs":62},"s05","Salinity in natural habitats",[63],{"id":64,"text":65,"source_ids":66,"claim_type":26},"s05-p01","Western Australian records support an association with salt-lake margins and mildly saline habitats. Craig et al. further linked source-site salinity with seedling responses among provenances; this is provenance-level evidence, not a continuous root-zone exposure for an individual plant.",[35,24,25],{"id":68,"title":69,"paragraphs":70},"s06","Salinity studies",[71,75,79],{"id":72,"text":73,"source_ids":74,"claim_type":37},"s06-p01","The higher- and moderate-salinity source areas were reported at ECe >2200 and about 1100 mS\u002Fm, respectively. Craig et al. measured natural source soils by saturated-paste extract at depths of 50–600 mm; Table 2 reports EC variation by site, year and soil layer. These provenance comparisons are not continuous root-zone exposures for individual plants.",[35],{"id":76,"text":77,"source_ids":78,"claim_type":37},"s06-p02","Ravensthorpe-source seedlings had 100% survival after 12 weeks of saline irrigation at final ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm; Figure 5 separately reports shoot biomass.",[35],{"id":80,"text":81,"source_ids":82,"claim_type":37},"s06-p03","eHALOPH’s maximum-salinity field lists 9.5 dS\u002Fm and cites Craig et al. (1990). This converts to 950 mS\u002Fm, one-tenth of the paper’s final irrigation-water ECw of 9500 mS\u002Fm. The database does not identify the material or endpoint represented by its field, and the unit or transcription discrepancy remains unresolved.",[83],"S3",{"id":85,"title":86,"paragraphs":87},"s07","Reported mechanisms and ecological adaptations",[88],{"id":89,"text":90,"source_ids":91,"claim_type":26},"s07-p01","Seedlings from higher- and moderate-salinity provenances differed in leaf sodium accumulation, indicating variation among sources. Survival and biomass after 12 weeks are separate endpoints and do not establish a whole-life-cycle tolerance mechanism.",[35,24,25],{"id":93,"title":94,"paragraphs":95},"s08","Conclusions and evidence gaps",[96],{"id":97,"text":98,"source_ids":99,"claim_type":26},"s08-p01","Salt-lake-margin records and Craig et al.’s provenance experiment support an association with Western Australian saltlands. Ravensthorpe-source seedlings all survived salt-only irrigation at final ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm, and Figure 5 separately reports shoot biomass. eHALOPH’s 9.5 dS\u002Fm converts to 950 mS\u002Fm, tenfold lower than the paper’s reading; the reason is unresolved.",[35,24,83,25],[101,115,129],{"id":102,"source_ids":103,"description":104},"M01",[35],{"evidence_type":105,"material":106,"salt_metric":107,"value_and_unit":108,"medium_and_exposure":109,"life_stage":110,"duration":111,"endpoint":112,"result":113,"limitations":114},"Comparison of source-soil ECe for higher- and moderate-salinity Acacia redolens provenances","Natural Acacia redolens provenances, including Ravensthorpe; not a root-zone treatment","Mixed salts in natural source soils","Higher-salinity provenance: ECe >2200 mS\u002Fm; moderate-salinity provenance: about 1100 mS\u002Fm","Western Australian provenance soils measured by saturated-paste extract; full survey sampled 50–600 mm, species-specific depth details unavailable","Source-site context and seed provenance","At collection; no treatment exposure","Comparison of source-soil salinity; later seedling ion accumulation and survival were separate endpoints","The paper compared tissue-ion accumulation among seedling provenances; upper leaves of higher-salinity-source A. redolens and A. patagiata contained less Na than those from corresponding moderate-salinity sources. This is a provenance difference and does not by itself establish a genetic mechanism.","ECe refers to provenance soils, not a treated root zone. The survey sampled 50–600 mm, and Table 2 reports values by site, year and depth; the higher\u002Fmoderate summary values are not assigned to a particular depth for this species and are not converted to NaCl treatment.",{"id":116,"source_ids":117,"description":118},"M02",[35],{"evidence_type":119,"material":120,"salt_metric":121,"value_and_unit":122,"medium_and_exposure":123,"life_stage":124,"duration":125,"endpoint":126,"result":127,"limitations":128},"12-week Ravensthorpe-provenance seedling survival trial at ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm","Seedlings from natural saltland provenances of A. redolens, including Ravensthorpe","Mixed NaCl, MgSO₄ and CaCl₂ at a 16:3:1 molar ratio; not pure NaCl.","Final irrigation-water ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm","Potted seedlings received saline irrigation, increased by 100 mM weekly over 12 weeks to the final ECw. The saline solution was maintained with drainage flushing. Figure 5 separately reports shoot biomass.","Seedlings","12 weeks","Survival","Under salt-only treatment, 100% of Ravensthorpe-source A. redolens survived at final ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm. Figure 5 separately reports shoot biomass for treatments and controls; survival and biomass are distinct endpoints.","Survival is not a growth threshold, and ECw is not NaCl molarity. The article also reports biomass, with responses differing among provenances and waterlogging conditions.",{"id":130,"source_ids":131,"description":132},"M03",[83],{"evidence_type":133,"material":134,"salt_metric":135,"value_and_unit":136,"medium_and_exposure":137,"life_stage":138,"duration":138,"endpoint":139,"result":140,"limitations":141},"eHALOPH database maximum-salinity field","A. redolens record in the database; provenance unspecified","Not specified","9.5 dS\u002Fm (eHALOPH value)","Database maximum-salinity field; method and medium unspecified","Unspecified","Database maximum-salinity field","eHALOPH lists 9.5 dS\u002Fm, equivalent to 950 mS\u002Fm; Craig et al. report final irrigation-water ECw of 9500 mS\u002Fm, a tenfold difference. The database does not specify the material or endpoint represented by its field, and the discrepancy may reflect units or transcription, but its cause cannot be determined.","The database does not identify the material, medium or endpoint underlying its value. The 9.5 dS\u002Fm entry converts to 950 mS\u002Fm, tenfold below the paper’s ECw of 9500 mS\u002Fm; available sources do not resolve a possible unit or transcription error, and the field is not an independent experiment.",[143,150],{"name_original":144,"display_name":145,"record_id":146,"verification_level":147,"support_scope":148,"source_ids":149},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","12002","archived_synthesis","eHALOPH species entry 12002 lists maximum salinity 9.5 dS\u002Fm, marks the genotype field “Yes,” and cites Craig et al. (1990). The paper reports source-soil ECe of 1,000–4,800 mS\u002Fm and final irrigation-water ECw of 9,500 mS\u002Fm; 9.5 dS\u002Fm converts to 950 mS\u002Fm, tenfold below the final ECw. The database does not identify the material or endpoint represented by its field, so the discrepancy remains unresolved; the catalogue field is not independent evidence.",[83],{"name_original":151,"display_name":152,"record_id":153,"verification_level":154,"support_scope":155,"source_ids":156},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","baseline row 14","local_original","FloraVeg candidate row 14 did not match this species, so no saline\u002Fbrackish EUNIS habitat is linked; the European database also does not cover Western Australia.",[157],"S6",[159,165,171,176,180,187],{"id":35,"citation_original":160,"url":161,"additional_urls":162,"source_kind":163,"verification_level":154,"checked_at":164},"Craig, G.F., D.T. Bell & C.A. Atkins. 1990. Response to salt and waterlogging stress of 10 taxa of Acacia selected from naturally saline areas of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 38(6):619–630. DOI:10.1071\u002FBT9900619","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1071\u002FBT9900619",[],"primary_experiment","2026-10-04",{"id":24,"citation_original":166,"url":167,"additional_urls":168,"source_kind":169,"verification_level":147,"checked_at":170},"Cowan & Maslin, WorldWideWattle \u002F Flora of Australia species fact sheet: Acacia redolens","https:\u002F\u002Fapps.lucidcentral.org\u002Fwattle\u002Ftext\u002Fentities\u002Facacia_redolens.htm",[],"authoritative_flora","2026-09-29",{"id":83,"citation_original":172,"url":173,"additional_urls":174,"source_kind":175,"verification_level":147,"checked_at":170},"eHALOPH species record 12002","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F12002",[],"database",{"id":25,"citation_original":177,"url":178,"additional_urls":179,"source_kind":169,"verification_level":147,"checked_at":170},"Acacia redolens habitat summaries, Arizona State University Desert Legume Program","https:\u002F\u002Fcales.arizona.edu\u002Fdesertlegumeprogram\u002Flegume-taxa\u002Facacia-redolens.html",[],{"id":36,"citation_original":181,"url":182,"additional_urls":183,"source_kind":184,"verification_level":185,"checked_at":186},"Plants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Acacia redolens Maslin.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:471301-1",[],"taxonomic_authority","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":157,"citation_original":188,"url":189,"additional_urls":190,"source_kind":175,"verification_level":154,"checked_at":186},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[191],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",1792838238066]