[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":193},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-14-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":6,"document":7},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",14,"Acacia redolens",{"schema_version":8,"language":9,"id":5,"taxonomy":10,"display_name":6,"family_display":14,"genus_display":15,"description":16,"tolerance_evidence":102,"database_records":143,"sources":159},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":6,"accepted_name":11,"family":12,"genus":13},"Acacia redolens Maslin","Fabaceae","Acacia","豆科","金合欢属",{"summary":17,"sections":18},"Acacia redolens见于西澳盐湖边缘和轻盐或碱性土壤。Craig等比较了不同盐地来源的种苗；来源土ECe、盐水ECw、存活和生物量分别报告。",[19,29,40,48,61,69,86,94],{"id":20,"title":21,"paragraphs":22},"s01","概述",[23],{"id":24,"text":17,"source_ids":25,"claim_type":28},"s01-p01",[26,27],"S2","S4","project_synthesis",{"id":30,"title":31,"paragraphs":32},"s02","名称与分类",[33],{"id":34,"text":35,"source_ids":36,"claim_type":39},"s02-p01","Acacia redolens Maslin；西澳原生范围内盐湖边缘\u002F轻度盐化和碱性土壤种群；实验另区分Ravensthorpe高盐与中盐来源种源。",[37,26,27,38],"S1","S5","source_fact",{"id":41,"title":42,"paragraphs":43},"s03","形态与鉴别",[44],{"id":45,"text":46,"source_ids":47,"claim_type":39},"s03-p01","西澳匍匐至低矮灌木，枝上有扁平叶状柄，花呈黄色球头，形成扁平荚果。田间可结合叶状柄形态、脉序、花序和荚果鉴别近似金合欢；种源间盐响应差异不属于分类特征。",[26,27],{"id":49,"title":50,"paragraphs":51},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[52,56],{"id":53,"text":54,"source_ids":55,"claim_type":39},"s04-p01","西澳植物志资料记载本种见于微盐或碱性壤土、黏土和黏壤土，常在盐湖边缘。Craig等又比较Ravensthorpe不同盐度来源的种子。",[37,26,27,38],{"id":57,"text":58,"source_ids":59,"claim_type":60},"s04-p02","所引区域资料未给出一致的开花或结果季节。",[38],"evidence_gap",{"id":62,"title":63,"paragraphs":64},"s05","自然生境盐分关联",[65],{"id":66,"text":67,"source_ids":68,"claim_type":28},"s05-p01","西澳资料支持盐湖边缘和轻度盐化生境关联。Craig等的种源研究进一步显示，不同来源地盐度与后代苗期响应相联系；它描述的是种源差异，不是单株连续根区暴露。",[37,26,27],{"id":70,"title":71,"paragraphs":72},"s06","耐盐研究",[73,77,81],{"id":74,"text":75,"source_ids":76,"claim_type":39},"s06-p01","高盐与中盐来源区分别报告ECe >2200和约1100 mS\u002Fm。Craig等以饱和糊提取法测量自然来源土，采样深度为50–600 mm；Table 2按地点、年份和土层列出EC变异，种源比较不等于单株连续根区暴露。",[37],{"id":78,"text":79,"source_ids":80,"claim_type":39},"s06-p02","Ravensthorpe来源幼苗在12周盐水灌溉试验中，于最终ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm时100%存活；Figure 5另报告shoot biomass。",[37],{"id":82,"text":83,"source_ids":84,"claim_type":39},"s06-p03","eHALOPH最大盐度字段列9.5 dS\u002Fm并引用Craig等（1990）。该值换算为950 mS\u002Fm，低于论文最终灌溉水ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm十倍；数据库所映射的材料和端点仍不明，单位或转录差异尚未解决。",[85],"S3",{"id":87,"title":88,"paragraphs":89},"s07","已报道机制与生态适应",[90],{"id":91,"text":92,"source_ids":93,"claim_type":28},"s07-p01","高盐来源与中盐来源种苗的叶片钠积累不同，提示种源间响应有差异。12周存活和生物量是不同端点，尚不足以说明全生活史的耐盐机制。",[37,26,27],{"id":95,"title":96,"paragraphs":97},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[98],{"id":99,"text":100,"source_ids":101,"claim_type":28},"s08-p01","自然盐湖边缘记录与Craig等的种源试验支持本种与西澳盐地的关联。Ravensthorpe来源苗在最终ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm下盐单独处理后全部存活，Figure 5另报告shoot biomass。eHALOPH的9.5 dS\u002Fm换算为950 mS\u002Fm，与论文读数相差十倍，原因未明。",[37,26,85,27],[103,117,131],{"id":104,"source_ids":105,"description":106},"M01",[37],{"evidence_type":107,"material":108,"salt_metric":109,"value_and_unit":110,"medium_and_exposure":111,"life_stage":112,"duration":113,"endpoint":114,"result":115,"limitations":116},"高盐与中盐Acacia redolens种源地土壤ECe比较测量","Acacia redolens不同自然种源（包括Ravensthorpe）；并非处理根区值","自然源土混合盐","ECe >2200（高盐种源）；约1100（中盐种源） mS\u002Fm ECe","西澳本种自然种源地土；饱和糊提取物ECe；全调查取土深度50–600 mm，本种各深度明细未取得","源地背景\u002F种源","采集时背景","比较源地盐度；后续苗期盐试验离子累积\u002F存活","原文比较不同来源种苗的组织离子积累；高盐来源A. redolens和A. patagiata上部叶片Na含量低于相应中盐来源。该结果是种源间差异，不单独证明遗传机制。","ECe为来源区土壤值而非处理根区浓度。调查采样深度为50–600 mm，但Table 2按地点、年份和土层列值；不将高盐\u002F中盐概括值配给本种某一深度，也不换算成NaCl处理。",{"id":118,"source_ids":119,"description":120},"M02",[37],{"evidence_type":121,"material":122,"salt_metric":123,"value_and_unit":124,"medium_and_exposure":125,"life_stage":126,"duration":127,"endpoint":128,"result":129,"limitations":130},"Ravensthorpe来源幼苗9500 mS\u002Fm ECw下12周存活试验","A. redolens自然盐地种源幼苗（Ravensthorpe等）","NaCl、MgSO₄和CaCl₂组成的混合盐，摩尔比16:3:1；非纯NaCl处理","9500 mS\u002Fm ECw","盆栽幼苗以盐水灌溉，每周升高100 mM，12周达到最终ECw；盐液经排水冲洗维持。Figure 5另报告shoot biomass。","幼苗","12周","存活","盐单独处理下Ravensthorpe来源A. redolens在最终ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm时100%存活。论文另以Figure 5报告处理与对照shoot biomass；存活率与生物量是不同端点。","存活端点不是生长阈值，ECw也不是NaCl摩尔浓度。论文另报告生物量，且不同种源与水涝条件下的响应有所区别。",{"id":132,"source_ids":133,"description":134},"M03",[85],{"evidence_type":135,"material":136,"salt_metric":137,"value_and_unit":138,"medium_and_exposure":139,"life_stage":137,"duration":137,"endpoint":140,"result":141,"limitations":142},"eHALOPH记录的最大盐度字段","数据库所列A. redolens种源","未知","9.5 dS\u002Fm（eHALOPH转录）","数据库转录的最大盐度；方法\u002F介质不明","最大测试\u002F耐受字段","eHALOPH列9.5 dS\u002Fm，换算为950 mS\u002Fm；Craig等报告的最终灌溉水ECw为9500 mS\u002Fm，数值相差十倍。数据库字段的具体材料和端点未说明，差异可能来自单位或转录，但目前无法判定。","数据库未说明其值对应的材料、介质或端点。9.5 dS\u002Fm换算为950 mS\u002Fm，与论文ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm相差十倍；现有资料不能确定是单位换算还是转录问题，该字段不作为独立试验结果。",[144,151],{"name_original":145,"display_name":146,"record_id":147,"verification_level":148,"support_scope":149,"source_ids":150},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","12002","archived_synthesis","eHALOPH种级条目12002列最大盐度9.5 dS\u002Fm、基因型字段Yes，并引用Craig等（1990）。论文报告源土ECe 1000–4800 mS\u002Fm及最终灌溉水ECw 9500 mS\u002Fm；9.5 dS\u002Fm换算为950 mS\u002Fm，与最终ECw相差十倍。数据库未说明字段对应的材料或端点，差异原因未明；该目录字段不是独立证据。",[85],{"name_original":152,"display_name":153,"record_id":154,"verification_level":155,"support_scope":156,"source_ids":157},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","baseline row 14","local_original","FloraVeg候选行14未与本种建立有效匹配，因此没有可关联的盐\u002F半咸水EUNIS生境；该欧洲数据库覆盖范围也不包括西澳。",[158],"S6",[160,166,172,177,181,188],{"id":37,"citation_original":161,"url":162,"additional_urls":163,"source_kind":164,"verification_level":155,"checked_at":165},"Craig, G.F., D.T. Bell & C.A. Atkins. 1990. Response to salt and waterlogging stress of 10 taxa of Acacia selected from naturally saline areas of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 38(6):619–630. DOI:10.1071\u002FBT9900619","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1071\u002FBT9900619",[],"primary_experiment","2026-10-04",{"id":26,"citation_original":167,"url":168,"additional_urls":169,"source_kind":170,"verification_level":148,"checked_at":171},"Cowan & Maslin, WorldWideWattle \u002F Flora of Australia species fact sheet: Acacia redolens","https:\u002F\u002Fapps.lucidcentral.org\u002Fwattle\u002Ftext\u002Fentities\u002Facacia_redolens.htm",[],"authoritative_flora","2026-09-29",{"id":85,"citation_original":173,"url":174,"additional_urls":175,"source_kind":176,"verification_level":148,"checked_at":171},"eHALOPH species record 12002","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F12002",[],"database",{"id":27,"citation_original":178,"url":179,"additional_urls":180,"source_kind":170,"verification_level":148,"checked_at":171},"Acacia redolens habitat summaries, Arizona State University Desert Legume Program","https:\u002F\u002Fcales.arizona.edu\u002Fdesertlegumeprogram\u002Flegume-taxa\u002Facacia-redolens.html",[],{"id":38,"citation_original":182,"url":183,"additional_urls":184,"source_kind":185,"verification_level":186,"checked_at":187},"Plants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Acacia redolens Maslin.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:471301-1",[],"taxonomic_authority","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":158,"citation_original":189,"url":190,"additional_urls":191,"source_kind":176,"verification_level":155,"checked_at":187},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[192],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",1792838175038]