[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":194},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-17-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":6,"document":7},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",17,"Acacia stenophylla",{"schema_version":8,"language":9,"id":5,"taxonomy":10,"display_name":6,"family_display":14,"genus_display":15,"description":16,"tolerance_evidence":101,"database_records":143,"sources":159},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":6,"accepted_name":11,"family":12,"genus":13},"Acacia stenophylla A.Cunn. ex Benth.","Fabaceae","Acacia","豆科","金合欢属",{"summary":17,"sections":18},"Acacia stenophylla沿澳大利亚内陆水道和洪泛地生长，也见于盐化黏土。现有研究包括NaCl水培、混合海盐幼苗灌溉和盐排水地栽植树木观察；其材料、盐分指标与生长端点各不相同。",[19,31,40,48,60,68,85,93],{"id":20,"title":21,"paragraphs":22},"s01","概述",[23],{"id":24,"text":17,"source_ids":25,"claim_type":30},"s01-p01",[26,27,28,29],"S1","S2","S3","S4","project_synthesis",{"id":32,"title":33,"paragraphs":34},"s02","名称与分类",[35],{"id":36,"text":37,"source_ids":38,"claim_type":39},"s02-p01","Acacia stenophylla A.Cunn. ex Benth.是澳大利亚内陆常绿灌木或小乔木；区域生境和试验材料按各来源所用名称分别记录。",[26],"source_fact",{"id":41,"title":42,"paragraphs":43},"s03","形态与鉴别",[44],{"id":45,"text":46,"source_ids":47,"claim_type":39},"s03-p01","常绿灌木或小乔木，可高至约20米，枝条常下垂。",[26],{"id":49,"title":50,"paragraphs":51},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[52,56],{"id":53,"text":54,"source_ids":55,"claim_type":39},"s04-p01","WorldWideWattle原文写本种常见于澳洲内陆水道边，生于洪泛低地重黏土，并记载土壤可盐化；Marcar等长期盐排水地栽植试验补充实测盐根区生长，但该实验站种植不是野生群落。",[26,27],{"id":57,"text":58,"source_ids":59,"claim_type":39},"s04-p02","澳大利亚资料记载通常3月至8月开花，个别地区可在年内不规则开花；荚果多于10月至12月成熟。",[26],{"id":61,"title":62,"paragraphs":63},"s05","自然生境盐分关联",[64],{"id":65,"text":66,"source_ids":67,"claim_type":30},"s05-p01","澳大利亚区域资料将本种记录于内陆水道、洪泛地及部分盐化黏土。它也见于非盐性河岸，说明盐地只是其较广泛河岸生境的一部分。",[26],{"id":69,"title":70,"paragraphs":71},"s06","耐盐研究",[72,76,80],{"id":73,"text":74,"source_ids":75,"claim_type":39},"s06-p01","Abbas等（2017）将来自5个相距较远种群的幼苗置于25 L曝气、半强度Hoagland营养液中，设置0、100、200 mM NaCl。幼苗移入时高16±2 cm，无盐驯化7天后在两天内升至目标浓度，第14天换液；盐处理共28天。200 mM组末茎\u002F根长为13.3±1.22\u002F10.2±1.0 cm，干重为0.32±0.01\u002F0.16±0.006 g；100 mM组末茎长为19.1±1.08 cm。原文未报告施盐前一刻的生长量，因此末端大小不能确定处理期间的净变化。Sahito等（2013）以卡拉奇一株树的种子培育砂培幼苗，进行6周混合海盐灌溉（20次盐水灌溉），处理为0–1.2%海盐、ECiw 0.60–16.67 dS\u002Fm。不同性状拟合的50%降低值为8.35–18.52 dS\u002Fm（均值12.51±1.51）；18.52 dS\u002Fm拟合值高于实测最高ECiw，属于外推。Marcar等报告盐排水地栽植树木61或72个月的田间观察，ECe约6–10 dS\u002Fm；其摘要称至10 dS\u002Fm未见生长下降。这些水培、灌溉水和田间土壤结果对应不同系统。",[28],{"id":77,"text":78,"source_ids":79,"claim_type":39},"s06-p02","Sahito等（2013）以2012年3月采自卡拉奇大学植物学系一株树的种子培育温室砂培幼苗，进行6周混合海盐灌溉（20次盐水灌溉）。海盐处理为0、0.15、0.3、0.6、0.9和1.2%，相应灌液ECiw为0.60、3.51、5.24、9.23、12.81和16.67 dS\u002Fm。茎根长度、叶\u002F叶状柄数和器官鲜干重均随ECiw改变；不同性状的50%降低拟合值为8.35–18.52 dS\u002Fm，均值12.51±1.51 dS\u002Fm。18.52 dS\u002Fm高于实测最高ECiw，是回归外推而非实测处理阈值。",[29],{"id":81,"text":82,"source_ids":83,"claim_type":39},"s06-p03","Marcar等在盐排水地观察栽植树木61或72个月，报告根区0–60 cm的ECe约6–10 dS\u002Fm；摘要称A. stenophylla在ECe不高于10 dS\u002Fm时未见生长下降。eHALOPH另列6.91和60.9 dS\u002Fm，但两值与试验指标的对应关系未能由摘要确认。",[27,84],"S5",{"id":86,"title":87,"paragraphs":88},"s07","已报道机制与生态适应",[89],{"id":90,"text":91,"source_ids":92,"claim_type":30},"s07-p01","盐分、碱性和周期性淹水共同塑造其水道生境。区域资料描述本种耐盐和耐涝；现有生长试验尚未阐明其盐适应的分子机制。",[26],{"id":94,"title":95,"paragraphs":96},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[97],{"id":98,"text":99,"source_ids":100,"claim_type":30},"s08-p01","水培试验未测施盐起点的生长量，因此200 mM下的净生长仍无法判定。Sahito的海盐处理为灌溉水ECiw，Marcar报告田间土壤ECe，均不能与水培NaCl剂量互换。eHALOPH所列60.9 dS\u002Fm仍为未经核实的数据库值。",[26,27,28,29,84],[102,116,129],{"id":103,"source_ids":104,"description":105},"M01",[28],{"evidence_type":106,"material":107,"salt_metric":108,"value_and_unit":109,"medium_and_exposure":110,"life_stage":111,"duration":112,"endpoint":113,"result":114,"limitations":115},"28天水培NaCl幼苗终点生长与生物量测量","研究所保存的5个相隔较远种群混合种源；进入水培时苗高16±2 cm，驯化7天后开始施盐","NaCl","0, 100, 200 mM NaCl","25 L半强度Hoagland水培；两天分次至100\u002F200mM，第14天换液并一次加回目标盐度，曝气、每日调pH6.0±0.5","幼苗","28天","末端茎\u002F根长度与鲜\u002F干重；无处理初始干重或器官增量","200 mM组末茎长13.3±1.22 cm、根长10.2±1.0 cm，茎\u002F根干重0.32±0.01\u002F0.16±0.006 g；100 mM组末茎长19.1±1.08 cm。苗高16±2 cm是在移入水培时测量，7天无盐驯化结束时没有基线；末端干重和移栽前苗高均不能确定28天盐处理期间的净生长。","盐处理前一刻未测幼苗高度、器官长度或生物量，且未报告初始器官干重；因此终点大小与移栽时16±2 cm苗高不能直接比较为处理期净生长。该试验可比较处理终点和相对响应，不能仅凭末端干重非零推断施盐后有净增长。",{"id":117,"source_ids":118,"description":119},"M02",[29],{"evidence_type":120,"material":121,"salt_metric":122,"value_and_unit":123,"medium_and_exposure":124,"life_stage":111,"duration":125,"endpoint":126,"result":127,"limitations":128},"混合海盐灌溉六周的砂培幼苗生长试验","2012年3月采自卡拉奇大学植物学系一株树的种子；温室砂培幼苗","未改良海盐混合物，非单一NaCl","海盐处理0、0.15、0.3、0.6、0.9、1.2%；配对ECiw分别为0.60、3.51、5.24、9.23、12.81、16.67 dS\u002Fm。","海盐灌溉水ECiw","6周，20次海盐液灌溉；收获约60日龄","茎根长度、叶\u002F叶状柄数、各器官鲜干重和总苗重；各ECiw处理的死亡数","六周试验显示形态和生物量随ECiw变化；各性状拟合的50%降低值为8.35–18.52 dS\u002Fm，跨性状均值12.51±1.51 dS\u002Fm，并非单一生长极限。12.81 dS\u002Fm组观察到1株死亡，16.67 dS\u002Fm组2株死亡。","植株预先经过阶梯升盐；处理液ECiw不是根区ECe，也不是纯NaCl浓度。18.52 dS\u002Fm拟合值超过最高实测ECiw 16.67 dS\u002Fm，属于外推，不能作为直接测得的阈值。",{"id":130,"source_ids":131,"description":132},"M03",[27,84],{"evidence_type":133,"material":134,"salt_metric":135,"value_and_unit":136,"medium_and_exposure":137,"life_stage":138,"duration":139,"endpoint":140,"result":141,"limitations":142},"盐排水田块栽植树木的长期ECe与生长观测","A. stenophylla栽植种源；批次\u002F来源未在摘要分开","混盐自然土","Marcar盐地试验分组ECe约6–10 dS\u002Fm；eHALOPH另转录6.91与60.9 dS\u002Fm，但其指标对应关系未核实。","长期盐排水地点根区ECe 0–60cm","成树\u002F栽植树","61或72个月","树高、DBH、生长趋势","Marcar等的摘要报告A. stenophylla在田间ECe不高于10 dS\u002Fm时没有生长下降；摘要没有把eHALOPH转录的60.9 dS\u002Fm与该种材料或端点对应。","研究为盐排水地栽植树木观察，未与野生种群作比较。现场ECe不可换算为灌溉水浓度；eHALOPH所列60.9 dS\u002Fm仍缺乏该项研究中的对应依据。",[144,151],{"name_original":145,"display_name":146,"record_id":147,"verification_level":148,"support_scope":149,"source_ids":150},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","12007","archived_synthesis","种级eHALOPH记录合并四种盐度\u002F种源来源：max_salinity字段列6.91、60.9、16.7 dS\u002Fm及200 mM，另列最适值0.6 dS\u002Fm。链接来源分别为Abbas等（2017）的200 mM水培试验、Sahito等（2013）的16.7 dS\u002Fm混合海盐灌溉ECiw、Marcar等（2003）的6.91 dS\u002Fm以及Shirazi（2006）的60.9 dS\u002Fm。Abbas等报告的28天试验中，末次茎长低于移栽前株高；终点干重本身不足以证明植株生长增加。Sahito研究记录的是混合海盐灌溉ECiw；其余EC字段的具体测量对应关系尚未明确，不能合并为单一阈值。",[84],{"name_original":152,"display_name":153,"record_id":154,"verification_level":155,"support_scope":156,"source_ids":157},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","unmatched exact baseline row 17","local_original","无有效物种匹配；本行无匹配taxon，EUNIS盐\u002F半咸关联0。FloraVeg taxon为空且match_type=unmatched。不作为无盐生性证据。",[158],"S6",[160,167,173,179,184,189],{"id":26,"citation_original":161,"url":162,"additional_urls":163,"source_kind":164,"verification_level":165,"checked_at":166},"WorldWideWattle \u002F Flora of Australia-derived profile, Acacia stenophylla","https:\u002F\u002Fcanbr.gov.au\u002Fcpbr\u002FWfHC\u002FAcacia-stenophylla\u002Findex.html",[],"authoritative_flora","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":27,"citation_original":168,"url":169,"additional_urls":170,"source_kind":171,"verification_level":148,"checked_at":172},"Marcar, N.E.; Crawford, D.F.; Hossain, A.K.M.A.; Nicholson, A.T. (2003). Survival and growth of the tree species and provenances in response to salinity on a discharge site. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43(11):1293–1302. DOI:10.1071\u002FEA02192","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1071\u002FEA02192",[],"primary_field","2026-09-29",{"id":28,"citation_original":174,"url":175,"additional_urls":176,"source_kind":177,"verification_level":155,"checked_at":178},"Abbas, G., Saqib, M., Akhtar, J. & Murtaza, G. (2017). Physiological and biochemical characterization of Acacia stenophylla and Acacia albida exposed to salinity under hydroponic conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47(9):1293–1301. DOI:10.1139\u002Fcjfr-2016-0499.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1139\u002Fcjfr-2016-0499",[],"primary_experiment","2026-10-04",{"id":29,"citation_original":180,"url":181,"additional_urls":182,"source_kind":177,"verification_level":183,"checked_at":178},"Sahito, Z.A., Khan, D. & Ahmed, N. (2013). Some parameters of growth of river cooba seedlings under salt stress. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology 10(3):339–352.","https:\u002F\u002Fijbbku.com\u002Fassets\u002Fcustom\u002Fjournals\u002F2013\u002F3\u002FSOME%20PARAMETERS%20OF%20GROWTH%20OF%20RIVER%20COOBA%20SEEDLINGS%20UNDER%20SALT%20STRESS.pdf",[],"full_text",{"id":84,"citation_original":185,"url":186,"additional_urls":187,"source_kind":188,"verification_level":148,"checked_at":172},"eHALOPH species record 12007","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F12007",[],"database",{"id":158,"citation_original":190,"url":191,"additional_urls":192,"source_kind":188,"verification_level":155,"checked_at":166},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[193],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",1792838175117]