[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":268},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-22-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":6,"document":7},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",22,"Acanthus ilicifolius",{"schema_version":8,"language":9,"id":5,"taxonomy":10,"display_name":6,"family_display":14,"genus_display":15,"description":16,"tolerance_evidence":116,"database_records":170,"sources":205},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":6,"accepted_name":11,"family":12,"genus":13},"Acanthus ilicifolius L.","Acanthaceae","Acanthus","爵床科","老鼠簕属",{"summary":17,"sections":18},"狭义Acanthus ilicifolius有安达曼海、印度及斯里兰卡红树林记录。2024年修订将泰马半岛东侧四倍体材料分为A. tetraploideus；旧广义名下的中国记录和生理试验需按材料来源重新判定。",[19,31,45,54,67,75,99,107],{"id":20,"title":21,"paragraphs":22},"s01","概述",[23],{"id":24,"text":25,"source_ids":26,"claim_type":30},"s01-p01","2024年分类修订缩小了Acanthus ilicifolius的种界。旧广义名下的红树林、生理试验和盐度记录涉及不同材料，其归属不能仅凭旧名称确定。",[27,28,29],"S1","S8","S9","project_synthesis",{"id":32,"title":33,"paragraphs":34},"s02","名称与分类",[35,41],{"id":36,"text":37,"source_ids":38,"claim_type":40},"s02-p01","Feng等2024年将旧广义A. ilicifolius的泰马半岛东侧四倍体支系分为A. tetraploideus H. Feng & Y. L. Huang；狭义A. ilicifolius主要指西侧二倍体种群，包括安达曼海、印度和斯里兰卡。中国植物志及较早数据库沿用广义名，相关旧记录不能仅凭名称归入现狭义范围；xiamenensis材料的分类归属仍待凭证核对。",[27,28,29,39],"S11","source_fact",{"id":42,"text":43,"source_ids":44,"claim_type":30},"s02-p02","2024年修订将旧广义 A. ilicifolius 的东侧四倍体支系分为 A. tetraploideus；现狭义 A. ilicifolius 为西侧二倍体。生态与实验记录按来源中的材料名称和地点解释。",[27,28,29,39],{"id":46,"title":47,"paragraphs":48},"s03","形态与鉴别",[49],{"id":50,"text":51,"source_ids":52,"claim_type":40},"s03-p01","红树灌木，叶片较厚且具刺状齿，花为具色带的两侧对称花，果实为蒴果。旧广义概念包括现已拆出的东侧四倍体材料；判断狭义 A. ilicifolius 应核对分布、形态与分类修订，不能只沿用旧数据库名称。",[27,28,29,53],"S10",{"id":55,"title":56,"paragraphs":57},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[58,62],{"id":59,"text":60,"source_ids":61,"claim_type":40},"s04-p01","Feng2024原野外采样表明确狭义A. ilicifolius在泰国Phuket、印度Kerala、印度Katka Sundarban及斯里兰卡Chilaw等天然红树林地点出现；Ragavan2015独立调查安达曼—尼科巴红树林，在林地靠陆缘高潮线附近及林内下层记录开花结实种群，保存Shoal Bay Creek凭证PBL30965\u002F30966。2015材料的大花、深色花冠中带及西侧地区与2024狭义处理相容，但凭证未重新做染色体鉴定。",[27,28,29,39],{"id":63,"text":64,"source_ids":65,"claim_type":66},"s04-p02","Ragavan等报告安达曼—尼科巴种群花期为2–3月、果期为4–5月；这是当地观察。",[29,39],"evidence_gap",{"id":68,"title":69,"paragraphs":70},"s05","自然生境盐分关联",[71],{"id":72,"text":73,"source_ids":74,"claim_type":30},"s05-p01","Feng等2024年列出的狭义本种采样点均在其西侧二倍体范围；旧广义名下的东亚记录需核对凭证后才能用于本种生态概述。现有自然记录提供红树林生境背景，但未给与植株配对的土壤盐度。",[27,28,29],{"id":76,"title":77,"paragraphs":78},"s06","耐盐研究",[79,84,89,94],{"id":80,"text":81,"source_ids":82,"claim_type":40},"s06-p01","健康的20–30 cm茎插条采自印度喀拉拉邦Kadalundi Vallikkunnu Community Reserve，先以15 μM IBA处理2 h促根，再在温室半强度改良Hoagland液中培养35 d至长出两对新叶；随后接受0、200、400或600 mM NaCl水培处理15天。400 mM下抗氧化响应较明显；600 mM下随处理时间延长，抗氧化酶活性下降，而抗氧化分子与MDA积累。研究测定生理指标，没有测持续生长或繁殖；材料仍按2024年拆分前的广义名称报道，未提供凭证或倍性复核。",[83],"S3",{"id":85,"text":86,"source_ids":87,"claim_type":40},"s06-p02","一项可访问的论文摘要报告，土壤ECe为8.30 dS\u002Fm时生物量是对照的2倍；渗透势在ECe不高于13.20 dS\u002Fm时未变，超过后升高。摘要未说明盐分组成、植株来源、处理时长、栽培方式或ECe测定方法，研究使用2024年拆分前的广义A. ilicifolius名称。",[88],"S2",{"id":90,"text":91,"source_ids":92,"claim_type":40},"s06-p03","GRHC的红树林土壤条目记载土壤含盐量“>0.6%”，但没有给出百分数基准、测量方法或具体样地；条目沿用2024年拆分前的广义A. ilicifolius名称。",[93],"S7",{"id":95,"text":96,"source_ids":97,"claim_type":40},"s06-p04","CNHP_1320在“海水盐度”栏列500 mM，另列400 mM数据库值。条目未提供原始试验出处或处理条件，两个字段也不是同一已核实的测量结果。",[98],"S5",{"id":100,"title":101,"paragraphs":102},"s07","已报道机制与生态适应",[103],{"id":104,"text":105,"source_ids":106,"claim_type":30},"s07-p01","短期NaCl试验测了抗氧化酶、MDA和渗透指标，但没有持续生长端点。较早土壤ECe资料属于另一盐体系，且按旧广义名称发表。",[27,88,83,29,53],{"id":108,"title":109,"paragraphs":110},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[111],{"id":112,"text":113,"source_ids":114,"claim_type":30},"s08-p01","狭义A. ilicifolius有西侧二倍体红树林种群记录；旧广义名称下的东亚资料不能不加核验地映射到现分类范围。短期NaCl试验测得抗氧化和渗透指标，未测持续生长；旧土壤ECe资料、500 mM“海水”字段及GRHC重复条目各有方法或分类限制。",[27,88,83,115,98,93,28],"S4",[117,131,145,159],{"id":118,"source_ids":119,"description":120},"M01",[83],{"evidence_type":121,"material":122,"salt_metric":123,"value_and_unit":124,"medium_and_exposure":125,"life_stage":126,"duration":127,"endpoint":128,"result":129,"limitations":130},"15天水培NaCl生理响应试验","论文材料来自印度喀拉拉邦Kadalundi Vallikkunnu Community Reserve红树林；使用20–30 cm、大小均匀且健康的茎插条，以15 μM吲哚丁酸处理2 h促根，生根后转入半强度改良Hoagland培养液。","NaCl","0, 200, 400, 600 mM NaCl","生根插条在半强度改良Hoagland液中温室预培养35 d，至长出两对新叶后开始水培NaCl处理；作者未报告按2024年分类修订对材料作凭证\u002F倍性复鉴。","由茎插条生根并预培养35 d、长出两对新叶的植株","15天","抗氧化酶、MDA、抗氧化物、渗透调节","400 mM下抗氧化响应更明显；600 mM下随处理时间延长，抗氧化酶活性下降，抗氧化分子和MDA积累。各处理组的PPO活性和抗坏血酸含量均低于对照。未测持续生长或繁殖端点；eHALOPH记录的400 mM不是生长阈值。","短期水培生理实验；“400mM tolerance”是作者表述，不能按持续生长证据解释。 名称沿用旧广义A.ilicifolius；实验或平台材料未按Feng2024拆分复鉴。",{"id":132,"source_ids":133,"description":134},"M02",[88],{"evidence_type":135,"material":136,"salt_metric":137,"value_and_unit":138,"medium_and_exposure":139,"life_stage":140,"duration":141,"endpoint":142,"result":143,"limitations":144},"摘要报告的土壤盐分ECe下生物量与渗透势观察","摘要所列A. ilicifolius；可访问摘要未说明材料来源或材料详情","土壤盐分；可访问摘要未说明盐分组成","ECe 8.30 dS\u002Fm；渗透势至ECe 13.20 dS\u002Fm未变，之后升高","摘要报告土壤盐分变化并以ECe表示，但未说明盐度施加方式、栽培设置或ECe测定方法","可访问摘要未说明","可访问摘要未报告","生物量、渗透势","中等盐度ECe 8.30 dS\u002Fm时生物量恰为对照的2倍；渗透势在ECe 13.20 dS\u002Fm及以下未变，超过后明确升高","ECe是土壤饱和浸提液电导率，盐分组成、材料来源、栽培方式和处理时长未在摘要中说明；研究名称采用2024年拆分前的广义A. ilicifolius。",{"id":146,"source_ids":147,"description":148},"M03",[93],{"evidence_type":149,"material":150,"salt_metric":151,"value_and_unit":152,"medium_and_exposure":153,"life_stage":154,"duration":155,"endpoint":156,"result":157,"limitations":158},"GRHC二手红树林土壤含盐量记录","东南沿海A. ilicifolius种级记录","土壤盐分，盐种未知",">0.6% 土壤盐分百分数（基准与测法未明）","GRHC记录中概述的红树林土壤","生境\u002F成株未详","未知","页面土壤盐含量字段","平台记载>0.6%，无测量方法；不能换算ECe、PSU或mM。","GRHC重复使用同一红树林介绍文字，且保留拆分前的广义名称；>0.6%未给盐分基准或测法。",{"id":160,"source_ids":161,"description":162},"M04",[98],{"evidence_type":163,"material":164,"salt_metric":155,"value_and_unit":165,"medium_and_exposure":166,"life_stage":155,"duration":155,"endpoint":167,"result":168,"limitations":169},"中国盐生植物名录“海水盐度”推测字段","CNHP_1320本种记录","500 mM（CNHP原表注明“海水盐度”）","数据库转录字段","目录最大盐度","原表同时列500mM海水盐度和400mM数据库值；前者量纲可疑，不作为本种的实测响应或已确认阈值。","未核来源；非可追溯NaCl mM阈值。",[171,178,184,191,197],{"name_original":172,"display_name":173,"record_id":174,"verification_level":175,"support_scope":176,"source_ids":177},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","12115","archived_synthesis","种级eHALOPH记录沿用广义A. ilicifolius概念，标注hydrohalophyte、salt glands yes、沿海生境及max_salinity 400 mM。400 mM链接Shackira & Puthur（2016）的15天NaCl生理试验，红树林生态来自另一些独立调查。400 mM是短期生理处理，未确定持续生长阈值。旧广义名称涵盖2024年拆分后的不同类群，东亚记录的现分类归属尚未通过材料复鉴确定。",[88,83,115],{"name_original":179,"display_name":180,"record_id":181,"verification_level":175,"support_scope":182,"source_ids":183},"china_halophyte_catalog","China Halophyte Catalogue","CNHP_1320","种级广义A. ilicifolius；种下材料未拆分；海边红树林\u002F海滩，泌盐型，500mM海水盐度及400mM。名录说明数值源自数据库；400mM可追Shackira 2016，500mM的“海水”mM说法无可核原始依据。生态条目与红树资料一致；500字段疑单位\u002F来源误读，400是短时指标，不作为耐盐生长阈值。 旧广义名称涵盖2024年拆分后的不同类群；东亚记录的现分类归属尚未通过材料复鉴确定。",[83,98],{"name_original":185,"display_name":186,"record_id":187,"verification_level":175,"support_scope":188,"source_ids":189},"mangrovedb","MangroveDB","mangrovedb:Acanthus_ilicifolius","MangroveDB将本种列为mangrove，未给盐度或生长阈值。该条目提供生态分类；所用旧广义名称涵盖2024年拆分后的不同类群，东亚记录的现分类归属尚未通过材料复鉴确定。",[190],"S6",{"name_original":192,"display_name":193,"record_id":194,"verification_level":175,"support_scope":195,"source_ids":196},"sdnu_grhc","SDNU GRHC","GRHC_H_2079; GRHC_E_1332; GRHC_H_2082; GRHC_P_2569","SDNU GRHC的H_2079为A. ilicifolius种级记录，E_1332重复其经济用途记录；H_2082\u002FP_2569为var. xiamenensis条目。种级段落记海滩红树林及>0.6%土壤含盐量，未说明百分数基准或测法。var. xiamenensis是分类归属有争议的种下单元，按China Flora较广分类概念链接至本种，不能代表所有种级材料。H\u002FE列表复用描述，属于同一平台来源链。平台沿用旧广义名称，东亚记录在2024年拆分后的现分类归属尚未通过材料复鉴确定。",[93],{"name_original":198,"display_name":199,"record_id":200,"verification_level":201,"support_scope":202,"source_ids":203},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","unmatched row 22","local_original","未匹配；含alias Acanthus xiamenensis；EUNIS盐\u002F半咸关系0。match_type=unmatched。对东南亚红树林种无判别力。",[204],"S12",[206,212,220,225,230,234,238,242,247,251,256,263],{"id":27,"citation_original":207,"url":208,"additional_urls":209,"source_kind":210,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"Flora of China 19, Acanthus ilicifolius L.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.efloras.org\u002Fflorataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200022448",[],"authoritative_flora","2026-09-29",{"id":88,"citation_original":213,"url":214,"additional_urls":215,"source_kind":217,"verification_level":218,"checked_at":219},"Bal AR, Dutt SK. 1987. Salt tolerance mechanism in Acanthus ilicifolius L. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 30(2):170–175.","https:\u002F\u002Findianjournals.com\u002Farticle\u002Fijpp-30o-2-006",[216],"https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Freference_view\u002F6351","primary_experiment","abstract","2026-10-03",{"id":83,"citation_original":221,"url":222,"additional_urls":223,"source_kind":217,"verification_level":224,"checked_at":219},"Shackira & Puthur. 2016. Antioxidant defence mechanism operational in a mangrove – Acanthus ilicifolius L. subjected to NaCl stress","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.journalijar.com\u002Fuploads\u002F941_IJAR-9387.pdf",[],"full_text",{"id":115,"citation_original":226,"url":227,"additional_urls":228,"source_kind":229,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"eHALOPH species record 12115","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F12115",[],"database",{"id":98,"citation_original":231,"url":232,"additional_urls":233,"source_kind":229,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"中国盐生植物名录 CNHP_1320","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biodiversity-science.net\u002Ffileup\u002F1005-0094\u002FDATA\u002F2025030.zip",[],{"id":190,"citation_original":235,"url":236,"additional_urls":237,"source_kind":229,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"MangroveDB species record Acanthus ilicifolius","https:\u002F\u002Fjasonxu.shinyapps.io\u002FMangroveDB\u002F",[],{"id":93,"citation_original":239,"url":240,"additional_urls":241,"source_kind":229,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"SDNU GRHC A. ilicifolius records GRHC_H_2079 and GRHC_E_1332; related xiamenensis GRHC_H_2082\u002FGRHC_P_2569","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.grhc.sdnu.edu.cn\u002Finfo\u002F1066\u002F2079.htm",[],{"id":28,"citation_original":243,"url":244,"additional_urls":245,"source_kind":246,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"Feng H, Banerjee AK, Guo W, Yuan Y, Duan F, Ng WL, Zhao X, Liu Y, Li C, Liu Y, Li L, Huang Y. 2024. Origin and evolution of a new tetraploid mangrove species in an intertidal zone. Plant Diversity 46(4):476–490. DOI:10.1016\u002Fj.pld.2024.04.007","https:\u002F\u002Fpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\u002Farticles\u002FPMC11390703\u002F",[],"primary_field",{"id":29,"citation_original":248,"url":249,"additional_urls":250,"source_kind":246,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"Ragavan P, Saxena A, Mohan PM, Jayaraj RSC, Ravichandran K. 2015. Taxonomy and distribution of species of the genus Acanthus (Acanthaceae) in mangroves of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Biodiversitas 16(2):225–237. DOI:10.13057\u002Fbiodiv\u002Fd160218","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.13057\u002Fbiodiv\u002Fd160218",[],{"id":53,"citation_original":252,"url":253,"additional_urls":254,"source_kind":255,"verification_level":175,"checked_at":211},"Plants of the World Online. Acanthus tetraploideus H.Feng & Y.L.Huang, accepted taxon 77316490-1.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002F77316490-1",[],"taxonomy",{"id":39,"citation_original":257,"url":258,"additional_urls":259,"source_kind":260,"verification_level":261,"checked_at":262},"Plants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Acanthus ilicifolius L.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:44873-1",[],"taxonomic_authority","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":204,"citation_original":264,"url":265,"additional_urls":266,"source_kind":229,"verification_level":201,"checked_at":262},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[267],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",1792838175312]