[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":389},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-375-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":7,"document":8},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",375,"海榄雌","Avicennia marina",{"schema_version":9,"language":10,"id":5,"taxonomy":11,"display_name":6,"family_display":15,"genus_display":16,"description":17,"tolerance_evidence":108,"database_records":240,"sources":303},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":7,"accepted_name":12,"family":13,"genus":14},"Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh.","Acanthaceae","Avicennia","爵床科 Acanthaceae","海榄雌属 Avicennia",{"summary":18,"sections":19},"海榄雌是从淡水影响河口到高盐潮间带的红树林乔木。天然记录与研究显示多种盐环境响应，但海盐、天然海水、土壤PSU、EC与纯NaCl分别解释。",[20,33,45,54,62,70,92,100],{"id":21,"title":22,"paragraphs":23},"s01","概述",[24],{"id":25,"text":26,"source_ids":27,"claim_type":32},"s01-p01","海榄雌（Avicennia marina）是热带和亚热带海岸红树林乔木，天然种群从淡水影响河口延伸至高盐潮间带。澳大利亚、孟加拉和阿曼的现场资料提供彼此独立的生境记录；培养研究涵盖NaCl、土壤PSU、天然海水、商业海盐与纯NaCl繁殖体，指标和生育阶段不可互换。",[28,29,30,31],"S01","S03","S04","S05","project_synthesis",{"id":34,"title":35,"paragraphs":36},"s02","名称与分类",[37],{"id":38,"text":39,"source_ids":40,"claim_type":44},"s02-p01","POWO接受Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh.，并列subsp. australasica、subsp. eucalyptifolia、subsp. marina及var. rumphiana。POWO当前将A. alba作为独立接受种；eHALOPH将其作为A. marina异名的注记与现行处理冲突。名称A. rumphiana对应接受变种var. rumphiana。",[28,41,42,43],"S02","S13","S15","source_fact",{"id":46,"title":47,"paragraphs":48},"s03","形态与鉴别",[49],{"id":50,"text":51,"source_ids":52,"claim_type":32},"s03-p01","本种为海榄雌属红树林乔木，具伸出沉积物的呼吸根，繁殖体在母株上萌发形成胎生繁殖体，叶片可有盐腺。一般红树林习性不能单独确定种下范围；Santini、Abu Hena和Atia研究所用材料均明确标作 A. marina。",[28,29,30,53],"S17",{"id":55,"title":56,"paragraphs":57},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[58],{"id":59,"text":60,"source_ids":61,"claim_type":44},"s04-p01","POWO原生范围为旧大陆热带、亚热带至澳大利亚，延及亚洲、非洲、澳大利亚及太平洋地区。现场记录来自澳大利亚Moreton Bay至Exmouth Gulf、孟加拉Bakkhali河口和阿曼沿海khawr。海水与河流、降雨及地下水混合作用形成地点和季节差异。",[28,29,30,31],{"id":63,"title":64,"paragraphs":65},"s05","自然生境中的盐分关联",[66],{"id":67,"text":68,"source_ids":69,"claim_type":32},"s05-p01","Santini等在五个天然站位30 cm深根区孔隙水测得15–54 ppt；Giralia Bay旱期为54±0.9 ppt。Abu Hena等记录孟加拉潮间带自然再生近单优林并按月测林床孔隙水，未给绝对值。Ghazanfar在阿曼28个沿海站位记录该种见于盐度较高的khawr；“>20”没有单位。该证据支持地区\u002F场址限定的天然盐环境关联，不是全种上限。",[29,30,31],{"id":71,"title":72,"paragraphs":73},"s06","耐盐研究",[74,81,88],{"id":75,"text":76,"source_ids":77,"claim_type":44},"s06-p01","Barhoumi等摘要报告0–1200 mM NaCl、300 mM四个月鲜重最高及1200 mM下存活，但未给足以判断净增长的基线；Naidoo以Beachwood Reserve来源幼株做0.1、0.3和0.5 M NaCl×NH4Cl氮处理3个月，设初始干重基线。茎和根生长总体在0.1 M较高；14 mg N\u002FL氮提升0.1\u002F0.3 M下的茎生长和0.3 M下的根生长，在0.5 M下无显著促进。Patel等在NaCl改良土壤PSU梯度中培养Gujarat繁殖体6个月；出苗随盐度升高而下降，幼苗生长在约7.7–15.4 PSU处理范围较高。",[78,79,80],"S06","S07","S08",{"id":82,"text":83,"source_ids":84,"claim_type":44},"s06-p02","Khan等以commercial sea salt设置50%和150%海水强度；50%促进生长，150%抑制生长，对照、50%和150%处理液EC分别为6、26和85 dS\u002Fm。Downton以St Kilda繁殖体培养约8–11个月，10–50%天然海水处理总鲜重和干重较高；无盐组早期快而后期矮化受损，100%海水组健康但矮小。Burchett的两组海水试验中，营养充足并经25%海水驯化的Townsville植株在25%海水下总生长和远端根呼吸较高，盐度更高后下降。后二者均用天然海水而非纯NaCl。",[85,86,87],"S09","S10","S11",{"id":89,"text":90,"source_ids":91,"claim_type":44},"s06-p03","Atia等全文试验以纯NaCl处理红海来源胎生繁殖体15日；300与600 mM均记录新根形成及第15日根\u002F胚轴端点。范围仅限萌发至早期生根苗，非成年株或完整生活史，也不是种级耐盐极限。",[53],{"id":93,"title":94,"paragraphs":95},"s07","已报道的机制与生态适应",[96],{"id":97,"text":98,"source_ids":99,"claim_type":44},"s07-p01","Atia等报告NaCl和NaHCO₃均降低繁殖体光合活性，根发生\u002F生长可能受此影响；300与600 mM NaCl下最终萌发比例未显著下降。Khan等测量盐诱导渗透调节物积累。盐种、阶段与端点分别报告，不跨研究外推。",[85,53],{"id":101,"title":102,"paragraphs":103},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[104],{"id":105,"text":106,"source_ids":107,"claim_type":32},"s08-p01","四项研究采用不同盐源、介质和生活阶段：Naidoo等以NaCl和氮素水培幼苗三个月；Patel等以NaCl改良土壤观察六个月幼苗生长；Downton与Burchett分别报告10–50%和25%天然海水处理下的较高生长。Barhoumi等摘要未报告盐前生物量基线，因而300 mM下鲜重较高不能单独证明净生长；Khan等使用商业海盐，处理液EC在对照、50%和150%海水强度下分别为6、26和85 dS\u002Fm。各研究的材料、处理和端点不同，不能合并为单一耐盐阈值。",[29,78,79,80,85,86,87,53],[109,123,137,151,165,179,191,205,219,233],{"id":110,"source_ids":111,"description":112},"M01",[29],{"evidence_type":113,"material":114,"salt_metric":115,"value_and_unit":116,"medium_and_exposure":117,"life_stage":118,"duration":119,"endpoint":120,"result":121,"limitations":122},"天然现场盐度观察","澳大利亚Moreton Bay、Noosa River及Exmouth Gulf天然A. marina林分；Giralia测值为降雨前","天然潮汐水\u002F淡水\u002F海水混合；离子组成未报告，不是纯NaCl","Lake Cootharaba 15±0.6；Brisbane River 20±1.2；Lake Cooroibah 36±1.0；Nudgee Creek 34±2.6；Giralia Bay干期 54±0.9；ppt（原表）","A. marina红树林站位的土壤孔隙水；手持吸取器在30 cm深采集，折射仪测盐度；Table 2各站n=3–4、均值±SE","天然红树林成林","现场采样；主要站位2010年3–4月，Giralia Bay于2010年8月干期采样","物种对应的根区孔隙水环境盐度，非生长处理或耐受上限","五个天然站位的孔隙水均值为15–54 ppt；Giralia干期54±0.9 ppt。","五个站位来自同一研究，数值描述场址和季节环境，不能确定单株阈值或最大耐受值，也不是纯NaCl浓度。",{"id":124,"source_ids":125,"description":126},"M02",[78],{"evidence_type":127,"material":128,"salt_metric":129,"value_and_unit":130,"medium_and_exposure":131,"life_stage":132,"duration":133,"endpoint":134,"result":135,"limitations":136},"盐处理实验\u002F摘要记录","Avicennia marina植物；摘要未说明繁殖材料、品系或具体阶段","NaCl（摘要明确）","0、150、300、600、900、1200；mM NaCl","控制条件处理；完整基质、灌液和根区监测方法未从摘要核见","摘要未说明；不能据此宣称全生活史","作者报告在暴露2与4个月后评估；300 mM结果明确到4个月","原刊摘要所述鲜重\u002F干重响应与最高档存活；未提供足以定位鲜重净增时间基线的分组原表。","摘要报告300mM NaCl、暴露4个月后鲜重最高，并把报告的“增加”归因于供水充分及较大的光合面积；同时称干重随盐度递增而降低。摘要未说明FW变化是相对基线、2至4个月的增量还是处理间终点比较，因此不能单独证明盐处理期间有新的组织净增长；1200mM仅报告存活，不能称为持续生长。","仅取得原刊摘要，完整Methods\u002FResults和原始FW时序\u002F初值未核；摘要的FW“increment”基准不清且可能反映组织含水差异。不能将1200mM存活称为持续生长。",{"id":138,"source_ids":139,"description":140},"M03",[79],{"evidence_type":141,"material":142,"salt_metric":143,"value_and_unit":144,"medium_and_exposure":145,"life_stage":146,"duration":147,"endpoint":148,"result":149,"limitations":150},"NaCl与氮素水培幼苗试验","德班Beachwood Nature Reserve采集的A. marina繁殖体育成植株；处理前另收获5株代表植株，建立初始根、茎干重基线。","NaCl；另有NH4Cl营养水平因子","0.1、0.3、0.5；M NaCl（作者原单位；分别为100、300、500 mM）","不曝气营养液培养；每盆10 L，作NaCl与NH4Cl氮水平析因处理，每两周换液、每日补蒸馏水以补偿蒸散。","由繁殖体育成的幼株；先在河砂\u002F堆肥（4:1）中生长7个月，再于营养液中培养2个月后开始盐处理。","3个月；设初始和末期收获，生长按干物质变化计算。","NaCl×氮处理下的根、茎生长\u002F干物质、水分状态及离子组成。","总体上0.1 M NaCl下生长较高，较高盐度下下降。添加14 mg N\u002FL使0.1和0.3 M时茎生长增加、0.3 M时根生长增加；0.5 M时无显著影响。","这是幼苗水培试验，NaCl与氮供应共同影响结果；不是野外阈值或全生活史响应。",{"id":152,"source_ids":153,"description":154},"M04",[80],{"evidence_type":155,"material":156,"salt_metric":157,"value_and_unit":158,"medium_and_exposure":159,"life_stage":160,"duration":161,"endpoint":162,"result":163,"limitations":164},"NaCl改良土壤中的幼苗盐度试验","Gujarat来源A. marina繁殖体\u002F幼苗，用于为期6个月的土壤盐度试验。","以PSU报告的NaCl改良土壤盐度；不是NaCl溶液摩尔浓度。","0.2、2.5、5.1、7.7、10.3、12.6、15.4、17.9、20.5、23.0、25.6和28.2 PSU。","温室土壤盐度梯度；作者称NaCl加入土壤并维持各盐度","幼苗建立\u002F生长","温室苗期生长6个月。","土壤盐度梯度下的出苗、幼苗生长和生物量。","土壤盐度升高时出苗下降；中等盐度约7.7–15.4 PSU时幼苗生长和生物量较高，较高处理下下降。","作者以PSU报告土壤盐度，不是溶液NaCl摩尔浓度；结果适用于6个月温室幼苗。",{"id":166,"source_ids":167,"description":168},"M05",[85],{"evidence_type":169,"material":170,"salt_metric":171,"value_and_unit":172,"medium_and_exposure":173,"life_stage":174,"duration":175,"endpoint":176,"result":177,"limitations":178},"受控商业海盐处理试验","种子繁殖的A. marina；盐处理前在盆中培育20周至幼苗期或约40周至幼树期","commercial sea salt，混合海盐；非纯NaCl","0%、50%、150% SWS（分别为对照、半强度和1.5倍海水盐度）；SWS（海水盐度相对强度）","沙质盆栽、网室环境；营养液底灌。每天补淡水校正水位，每7天换液；盐度每2天递增25% SWS，12天达到150%后继续4周再收获","幼苗与幼树","盐处理渐增12天，最高处理达到后4周收获","株高、叶数、叶面积、鲜重及干重的终点比较","50% SWS（中等盐度）促进生长，150% SWS下生长降低；研究直接说明盐源为commercial sea salt。","盐源为混合海盐，作者以SWS表示相对海水强度，并在处理前逐步升盐；该试验记录的是终点响应，SWS不能换算为纯NaCl浓度或阈值。",{"id":180,"source_ids":181,"description":182},"M06",[85],{"evidence_type":183,"material":184,"salt_metric":171,"value_and_unit":185,"medium_and_exposure":186,"life_stage":174,"duration":187,"endpoint":188,"result":189,"limitations":190},"Khan海盐处理的溶液EC记录","盐处理前培育20周的幼苗或约40周的幼树","对照6；50% SWS 26；150% SWS 85；dS\u002Fm（原文溶液EC）","同Khan等2016的沙盆底灌；EC对应其0%、50%和150% seawater-strength处理","渐增12天达最高，最高档后4周收获","不同海水强度盐液EC与植株生长响应","作者把50% SWS定义为26 dS\u002Fm的中度盐处理、150% SWS定义为85 dS\u002Fm的胁迫处理；控制液EC=6 dS\u002Fm，控制液不是零EC。","这些EC是混合海盐及营养液体系数值，不能转换成NaCl mM。85 dS\u002Fm是高盐处理条件，不代表已证上限或存活极限；eHALOPH未给85值直接reference ID，但Khan原文报告了这一同值处理。",{"id":192,"source_ids":193,"description":194},"M07",[86],{"evidence_type":195,"material":196,"salt_metric":197,"value_and_unit":198,"medium_and_exposure":199,"life_stage":200,"duration":201,"endpoint":202,"result":203,"limitations":204},"A. marina繁殖体的天然海水培养试验","南澳St Kilda来源A. marina繁殖体，在营养液中培养。","天然海水强度；为混合离子，不是纯NaCl。","0、10、25、50、75和100%天然海水（原文报告100%海水Na为500 mM、Cl为580 mM）。","含天然海水的营养液，盆栽培养。","种子\u002F幼苗起始并持续培养","约8–11个月。","生长及末期鲜重、干重。","10–50%海水处理的总鲜重和干重较高。无盐组早期生长快，随后矮化并出现损伤；100%海水组健康但生长矮小。","天然海水是混合盐介质；百分数表示相对海水强度，不换算为纯NaCl摩尔浓度。",{"id":206,"source_ids":207,"description":208},"M08",[87],{"evidence_type":209,"material":210,"salt_metric":211,"value_and_unit":212,"medium_and_exposure":213,"life_stage":214,"duration":215,"endpoint":216,"result":217,"limitations":218},"A. marina幼苗与繁殖体的天然海水盐处理试验","两组A. marina幼苗：Sydney野外采集的具2–3对叶幼苗，以及经25%海水驯化并补充营养的Townsville繁殖体。","天然海水百分比；混合盐处理。","0、25、50和100%天然海水。","分设野外幼苗与营养液培养系列；Townsville植株在最终处理前以25%海水驯化。","幼苗","最终盐度处理6周；研究报告幼苗培养系列共6–8周。","生长、根茎比、叶片肉质度、渗透势及根系呼吸。","营养充足的Townsville植株在25%海水下总生长和远端根呼吸较高，海水强度更高时下降；叶片肉质度和渗透势的响应趋势不同。","试验使用天然混合海水，两组材料的来源、营养和驯化条件不同；结果不是纯NaCl阈值。",{"id":220,"source_ids":221,"description":222},"M09",[53],{"evidence_type":223,"material":224,"salt_metric":225,"value_and_unit":226,"medium_and_exposure":227,"life_stage":228,"duration":229,"endpoint":230,"result":231,"limitations":232},"纯NaCl繁殖体—早期生根苗实验","红海Al Birk来源隐胎生繁殖体；每盘15个、3个重复。测末端分离的子叶、胚轴和新生根。","NaCl（纯NaCl处理；非混合海盐）","300；mM NaCl","塑料盘内3cm泥炭藓\u002F蛭石(3:1)，每盘以1L处理液润湿；覆盖透明膜减少蒸发以维持标称盐度，未实测根区盐度。","繁殖体萌发至15日早期生根苗；根在盐处理开始时尚未出现。","NaCl处理15日；按日记录生根比例。","生根形成比例（新器官）及第15日胚轴\u002F根干重；不是成年树生长或完整生活史。","第15日生根比例62%，最终萌发率88.9%；胚轴干重0.13±0.03g\u002Fplant，新根干重0.05±0.01g\u002Fplant。全文称300与600mM下胚轴及根生长未显著受抑，处理期间记录到新根形成；末端干重不是盐前后增量。","仅支持红海隐胎生繁殖体在覆盖培养中形成早期生根苗的15日盐处理证据；标称浓度以封膜处理维持，未报告实测根区浓度。表1报告第15日干重，不是基线增量；处理期间逐日记录生根比例，§3.4报告NaCl对根生长无显著影响。没有成年植株、野外持续盐度或完成生活史\u002F繁殖证据。",{"id":234,"source_ids":235,"description":236},"M10",[53],{"evidence_type":223,"material":224,"salt_metric":225,"value_and_unit":237,"medium_and_exposure":227,"life_stage":228,"duration":229,"endpoint":230,"result":238,"limitations":239},"600；mM NaCl","第15日生根比例62%，最终萌发率84.4%；胚轴干重0.11±0.03g\u002Fplant，新根干重0.04±0.01g\u002Fplant。作者称NaCl下胚轴及根生长未显著受抑，处理期间形成新根；证据限于该浓度下的早期生根苗，末端干重不是盐前后净增量。","证据仅限红海来源隐胎生繁殖体在覆盖培养中形成早期生根苗15日；不等同成年树、长期根区浓度或全生活史耐盐。根区未实测，Table 1末端干重不作为净增量，生长依据为15日新根发生\u002F生根时间序列与作者根生长端点。没有用600mM作为上限或极限。",[241,248,252,256,260,267,273,277,281,285,292,296],{"name_original":242,"display_name":243,"record_id":244,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":246,"source_ids":247},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","12396","archived_synthesis","多字段盐度\u002F生态索引，不是独立测量。300 mM鲜重证据有限、1200 mM仅存活；Naidoo 500 mM生长低于100 mM；Khan 26\u002F85 dS\u002Fm为商业海盐；PSU\u002F海水字段不是NaCl极限，A. alba异名注与POWO冲突。",[42],{"name_original":242,"display_name":243,"record_id":249,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":250,"source_ids":251},"11745","接受亚种索引；500 mM不外推全种，链接研究未核实整株持续生长端点。",[42],{"name_original":242,"display_name":243,"record_id":253,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":254,"source_ids":255},"12399","亚种线索；35.5 PSU和49 g\u002Fkg照录，不换算NaCl mM或外推全种。",[42],{"name_original":242,"display_name":243,"record_id":257,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":258,"source_ids":259},"13783","接受变种索引；35.5 PSU及叶离子分配研究不证明耐盐上限或NaCl分档。",[42],{"name_original":261,"display_name":262,"record_id":263,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":264,"source_ids":265},"china_halophyte_catalog","中国盐生植物目录","CNHP_1319","海岸红树林\u002F盐沼与泌盐标签为二级信息；260 mM\u002F26 dS\u002Fm来自Khan商业混盐，不是260 mM NaCl或独立原始记录。",[266],"S14",{"name_original":268,"display_name":269,"record_id":270,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":271,"source_ids":272},"mangrovedb","MangroveDB","mangrovedb:Avicennia_marina_subsp_australasica","种下生境简介，无盐度测量或试验。",[43],{"name_original":268,"display_name":269,"record_id":274,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":275,"source_ids":276},"mangrovedb:Avicennia_marina_subsp_eucalyptifolia","分类\u002F形态简介，无盐度数值或耐盐试验。",[43],{"name_original":268,"display_name":269,"record_id":278,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":279,"source_ids":280},"mangrovedb:Avicennia_marina_subsp_marina","河口红树林汇总生境描述；无盐度方法\u002F数值，不是独立现场证据。",[43],{"name_original":268,"display_name":269,"record_id":282,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":283,"source_ids":284},"mangrovedb:Avicennia_marina_var_rumphiana","接受变种生境\u002F形态索引，无盐度量化数据。",[43],{"name_original":286,"display_name":287,"record_id":288,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":289,"source_ids":290},"sdnu_grhc","山东师范大学植物资源库","GRHC_E_1314","一般红树林\u002F盐沼条目称土壤含盐量>0.6%，基准和方法未知，不能作上限。",[291],"S16",{"name_original":286,"display_name":287,"record_id":293,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":294,"source_ids":295},"GRHC_H_2053","同一门户重复的>0.6%二级说法，与GRHC_E_1314同源，不能计作独立研究。",[291],{"name_original":297,"display_name":298,"record_id":299,"verification_level":245,"support_scope":300,"source_ids":301},"floraveg","FloraVeg","baseline_row=375 (unmatched)","未匹配基线行、盐\u002F半咸水关系为0；不反驳现场红树林资料。",[302],"S18",[304,311,316,321,325,329,334,340,344,348,352,356,361,366,370,374,379,385],{"id":28,"citation_original":305,"url":306,"additional_urls":307,"source_kind":308,"verification_level":309,"checked_at":310},"POWO. Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh. Plants of the World Online, Kew Science.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:861130-1",[],"taxonomy","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":41,"citation_original":312,"url":313,"additional_urls":314,"source_kind":308,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"POWO. Avicennia alba Blume. Plants of the World Online, Kew Science.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:861116-1",[],"2026-10-01",{"id":29,"citation_original":317,"url":318,"additional_urls":319,"source_kind":320,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"Santini, N.S., Reef, R., Lockington, D.A. & Lovelock, C.E. (2015). The use of fresh and saline water sources by the mangrove Avicennia marina. Hydrobiologia 745(1):59–68. DOI: 10.1007\u002Fs10750-014-2091-2.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.researchgate.net\u002Fpublication\u002F269723388_The_use_of_fresh_and_saline_water_sources_by_the_mangrove_Avicennia_marina",[],"primary_field",{"id":30,"citation_original":322,"url":323,"additional_urls":324,"source_kind":320,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"Abu Hena, M.K., Japar Sidik, B., Idris, M.H., Nesarul, M.H., Aysha, A., Islam, M.S. & Nazmul, H. (2015). Forest structure and litter production of naturally re-generated white mangrove Avicennia marina in sub-tropical estuarine coast. Journal of Environmental Biology 36(5):1199–1204.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.jeb.co.in\u002Fjournal_issues\u002F201509_sep15\u002Fpaper_23.pdf",[],{"id":31,"citation_original":326,"url":327,"additional_urls":328,"source_kind":320,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"Ghazanfar, S.A. (1999). Coastal vegetation of Oman. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49(Supplement A):21–27. DOI: 10.1016\u002FS0272-7714(99)80004-3.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002FS0272-7714(99)80004-3",[],{"id":78,"citation_original":330,"url":331,"additional_urls":332,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"Barhoumi, Z., Hussain, A.A. & Atia, A. (2021). Physiological Response of Avicennia marina to Salinity and Recovery. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 68(4):696–707. DOI: 10.1134\u002FS1021443721040026.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pleiades.online\u002Fcgi-perl\u002Fsearch.pl?name=plntphys&number=4&page=696&type=abstract&year=21",[],"primary_experiment",{"id":79,"citation_original":335,"url":336,"additional_urls":337,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":338,"checked_at":339},"Naidoo, G. (1987). Effects of salinity and nitrogen on growth and water relations in the mangrove, Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. New Phytologist 107(2):317–325. DOI: 10.1111\u002Fj.1469-8137.1987.tb00183.x.","https:\u002F\u002Fnph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\u002Fdoi\u002Fabs\u002F10.1111\u002Fj.1469-8137.1987.tb00183.x",[],"local_original","2026-10-04",{"id":80,"citation_original":341,"url":342,"additional_urls":343,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":338,"checked_at":339},"Patel, N.T., Gupta, A. & Pandey, A.N. (2010). Salinity tolerance of Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh. from Gujarat coasts of India. Aquatic Botany 93(1):9–16. DOI: 10.1016\u002Fj.aquabot.2010.02.002.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.sciencedirect.com\u002Fscience\u002Farticle\u002Fpii\u002FS0304377010000203",[],{"id":85,"citation_original":345,"url":346,"additional_urls":347,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"Khan, F., Adnan, M.Y. & Aziz, I. (2016). Metabolic implications of salt induced osmolyte accumulation in Avicennia marina. Pakistan Journal of Botany 48(1):29–36.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.halophyte.org\u002Fpdfs\u002Fdrkhan_pdfs\u002F2016%201.pdf",[],{"id":86,"citation_original":349,"url":350,"additional_urls":351,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":338,"checked_at":339},"Downton, W.J.S. (1982). Growth and osmotic relations of the mangrove Avicennia marina, as influenced by salinity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 9(5):519–528. DOI: 10.1071\u002FPP9820519.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.researchgate.net\u002Fpublication\u002F262994475_Growth_and_Osmotic_Relations_of_the_Mangrove_Avicennia_marina_as_Influenced_by_Salinity",[],{"id":87,"citation_original":353,"url":354,"additional_urls":355,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":338,"checked_at":339},"Burchett, M.D., Field, C.D. & Pulkownik, A. (1984). Salinity, growth and root respiration in the grey mangrove, Avicennia marina. Physiologia Plantarum 60(2):113–118. DOI: 10.1111\u002Fj.1399-3054.1984.tb04549.x.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.researchgate.net\u002Fpublication\u002F227975170_Salinity_growth_and_root_respiration_in_the_grey_mangrove_Avicennia_marina",[],{"id":357,"citation_original":358,"url":359,"additional_urls":360,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"S12","Cram, W.J., Torr, P.G. & Rose, D.A. (2002). Salt allocation during leaf development and leaf fall in mangroves. Trees 16(2–3):112–119.","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Freference_view\u002F1569",[],{"id":42,"citation_original":362,"url":363,"additional_urls":364,"source_kind":365,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"eHALOPH. Avicennia marina species and infraspecific entries, record IDs 12396, 11745, 12399, 13783.","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F12396",[],"database",{"id":266,"citation_original":367,"url":368,"additional_urls":369,"source_kind":365,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"China Halophyte Catalogue 2025, entry CNHP_1319. Article DOI 10.17520\u002Fbiods.2025030; dataset DOI 10.57760\u002Fsciencedb.j00152.00028.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biodiversity-science.net\u002Ffileup\u002F1005-0094\u002FDATA\u002F2025030.zip",[],{"id":43,"citation_original":371,"url":372,"additional_urls":373,"source_kind":365,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"MangroveDB. Avicennia marina infraspecific entries (four taxon IDs).","https:\u002F\u002Fjasonxu.shinyapps.io\u002FMangroveDB\u002F",[],{"id":291,"citation_original":375,"url":376,"additional_urls":377,"source_kind":365,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"山东师范大学生命科学学院植物资源库，海榄雌条目GRHC_E_1314及GRHC_H_2053。","http:\u002F\u002Fwww.grhc.sdnu.edu.cn\u002Finfo\u002F1008\u002F1314.htm",[378],"http:\u002F\u002Fwww.grhc.sdnu.edu.cn\u002Finfo\u002F1066\u002F2053.htm",{"id":53,"citation_original":380,"url":381,"additional_urls":382,"source_kind":333,"verification_level":383,"checked_at":384},"Atia, A., Hussain, A.A. & Zouhaier, B. (2022). Germination and Photosynthetic Responses to Salinity and Alkalinity in Avicenna marina Propagules. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany 91(5):1015–1026. DOI: 10.32604\u002Fphyton.2022.017778.","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.techscience.com\u002Fphyton\u002Fv91n5\u002F46599\u002Fhtml",[],"full_text","2026-10-03",{"id":302,"citation_original":386,"url":387,"additional_urls":388,"source_kind":365,"verification_level":245,"checked_at":315},"FloraVeg local baseline candidate row for Avicennia marina, baseline_row=375 (unmatched).","https:\u002F\u002Ffloraveg.eu\u002F",[],1792838185125]