[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":213},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-7-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":7,"document":8},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",7,"苘麻","Abutilon theophrasti",{"schema_version":9,"language":10,"id":5,"taxonomy":11,"display_name":6,"family_display":15,"genus_display":16,"description":17,"tolerance_evidence":105,"database_records":146,"sources":169},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":7,"accepted_name":12,"family":13,"genus":14},"Abutilon theophrasti Medik.","Malvaceae","Abutilon","锦葵科","苘麻属",{"summary":18,"sections":19},"苘麻的盐分资料包括种子萌发试验和意大利Po河三角洲盐化农田中的自生记录；田间结果反映当地杂草分布，萌发结果则限于种子阶段。",[20,33,43,51,64,72,89,97],{"id":21,"title":22,"paragraphs":23},"s01","概述",[24],{"id":25,"text":26,"source_ids":27,"claim_type":32},"s01-p01","苘麻既有种子萌发盐处理，也有意大利Po河三角洲盐化农田的自生记录。后者描述当地杂草群落，不能概括所有种群的生理耐盐性。",[28,29,30,31],"S1","S2","S3","S5","project_synthesis",{"id":34,"title":35,"paragraphs":36},"s02","名称与分类",[37],{"id":38,"text":39,"source_ids":40,"claim_type":42},"s02-p01","接受名为苘麻（Abutilon theophrasti Medik.），按种级处理。除种子盐胁迫研究外，Nikolić等（2025）还在意大利Po河三角洲三块大豆或玉米田记录到自然自生的苘麻；这一自然定殖记录仅适用于该地区、该季节和盐化农田群落，不宜推广至所有种群。",[28,29,30,31,41],"S6","source_fact",{"id":44,"title":45,"paragraphs":46},"s03","形态与鉴别",[47],{"id":48,"text":49,"source_ids":50,"claim_type":42},"s03-p01","一年生直立草本，茎叶密被柔毛；叶大、心形、长柄，触感显著柔软，花小而黄，果实为具钩状突起的分裂蒴果。心形绒毛叶是常见识别特征，但植株大小受生境影响。",[28,29],{"id":52,"title":53,"paragraphs":54},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[55,59],{"id":56,"text":57,"source_ids":58,"claim_type":42},"s04-p01","常见区域杂草资料记录农田、路旁和荒地。Nikolić等2025明确调查作者未播种、自然自生的杂草群落；苘麻在Po河三角洲三块农田均出现，覆盖低、中、高土壤EC类别，在部分高盐区密度较高。现场EC为土:水1:2.5（w\u002Fw）提取后空间插值，不是逐株根际测量；资料因此支持区域盐化农田中的自然定殖，但不证明本种普遍专性盐生。",[28,29,31,41],{"id":60,"text":61,"source_ids":62,"claim_type":63},"s04-p02","现有资料没有一致、可靠的开花或结果季节记录；单一地区或园艺材料不足以概括本种物候。",[41],"evidence_gap",{"id":65,"title":66,"paragraphs":67},"s05","自然生境盐分关联",[68],{"id":69,"text":70,"source_ids":71,"claim_type":32},"s05-p01","Po河三角洲三块农田的自生苘麻出现在≤2、2–4和>4 dS\u002Fm三个土壤EC类别中；部分高EC区域的图斑密度较高。这是一次盐化农田的空间调查，不是自然盐沼调查。",[28,29,31],{"id":73,"title":74,"paragraphs":75},"s06","耐盐研究",[76,80,85],{"id":77,"text":78,"source_ids":79,"claim_type":42},"s06-p01","Xiong等用杂草种源的苘麻种子进行NaCl萌发试验：种子置于90 mm培养皿的双层滤纸上，每皿加4 mL去离子水或处理液并密封，在40\u002F30°C昼夜交替、14小时光照（约150 µmol m−2 s−1）下培养10天。萌发率随盐浓度上升而下降，100 mM时约0.5%，150 mM及以上未萌发。该结果仅反映种子阶段和所测种源。",[30],{"id":81,"text":82,"source_ids":83,"claim_type":42},"s06-p02","BiosalineDB转录张秀玲（2008）的描述称，NaCl≤50 mmol\u002FL可能促进苘麻种子萌发，≥200 mmol\u002FL时明显抑制。该数据库条目未列介质、种源和处理时长，因此此处只转述萌发方向，不与Xiong等试验合并为统一阈值，也不作为持续生长证据。",[84],"S4",{"id":86,"text":87,"source_ids":88,"claim_type":42},"s06-p03","Nikolić等在意大利Po河三角洲三块农田调查自生苘麻，并按土壤EC将样地分为≤2、2–4和>4 dS\u002Fm类别。土样以土:蒸馏水1:2.5（w\u002Fw）提取，振荡24小时后测EC并作GIS空间插值；作者于2022年7月12日和8月9日进行无人机调查，第二次密度分析沿用首次盐度分区。三块田和三个EC类别中均记录到本种，部分>4 dS\u002Fm区域图斑密度较高。这是局地空间关联，不是操控生长试验或逐株根际测量；土样深度未报告，EC也不能换算为NaCl浓度或个体生理极限。",[31],{"id":90,"title":91,"paragraphs":92},"s07","已报道机制与生态适应",[93],{"id":94,"text":95,"source_ids":96,"claim_type":32},"s07-p01","研究端点集中于种子萌发\u002F出苗及盐化农田中的杂草分布；这些数据不揭示成株的离子稳态或全生活史耐盐机制。",[28,29,30,31],{"id":98,"title":99,"paragraphs":100},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[101],{"id":102,"text":103,"source_ids":104,"claim_type":32},"s08-p01","现有资料分别支持种子阶段的盐胁迫响应和Po河三角洲农田中的自生分布。田间EC来自1:2.5土水提取与空间插值，第二次无人机调查沿用首次盐度分区；它说明局地分布关联，不给出逐株根区值或整株耐盐阈值。",[28,29,30,84,31],[106,120,132],{"id":107,"source_ids":108,"description":109},"M01",[30],{"evidence_type":110,"material":111,"salt_metric":112,"value_and_unit":113,"medium_and_exposure":114,"life_stage":115,"duration":116,"endpoint":117,"result":118,"limitations":119},"盐处理种子萌发试验","Abutilon theophrasti 种子；研究种源为杂草种子","NaCl","100（萌发率约0.5%）；≥150（无萌发） mM NaCl","90mm培养皿内铺两层Whatman No.1滤纸，加入4mL去离子水或处理液并密封；培养箱设40\u002F30°C交替日\u002F夜温度和14h光周期（白光约150µmol m−2 s−1）。","种子萌发","10天","萌发率","Figure 6显示NaCl升高时萌发下降：100mM时约0.5%，≥150mM时无萌发。","萌发率反映种子阶段，不代表已建立幼苗或成株生长；结果适用于所测杂草种源。",{"id":121,"source_ids":122,"description":123},"M02",[84],{"evidence_type":124,"material":125,"salt_metric":112,"value_and_unit":126,"medium_and_exposure":127,"life_stage":115,"duration":128,"endpoint":129,"result":130,"limitations":131},"BiosalineDB转录中国文献的种子萌发盐度摘要字段","苘麻种子；数据库条目未说明具体种源。","≤50促进、≥200明显抑制（数据库文字） mmol\u002FL NaCl","未知；BiosalineDB转录中国文献描述","未知","数据库摘要描述萌发方向","BiosalineDB引用张秀玲（2008）称≤50 mmol\u002FL NaCl可能促进种子萌发、≥200 mmol\u002FL抑制萌发。该种子响应来自与Xiong等（2018）不同的研究，未定义共同的剂量阈值。","数据库转述的是种子萌发响应；条目未列原研究的具体种源、介质和时长，且不代表持续植株生长。",{"id":133,"source_ids":134,"description":135},"M03",[31],{"evidence_type":136,"material":137,"salt_metric":138,"value_and_unit":139,"medium_and_exposure":140,"life_stage":141,"duration":142,"endpoint":143,"result":144,"limitations":145},"Po河三角洲农田杂草密度与土壤EC类别的野外遥感对应调查","Po河三角洲三块农田中自然自生的Abutilon theophrasti杂草；非作者播种或控制处理","混合\u002F未逐离子分型的土壤可溶盐","EC ≤2、2–4、>4 dS\u002Fm（分类阈值；土水提取液EC）","田间土:蒸馏水1:2.5（w\u002Fw）提取，24h振荡测EC后GIS空间插值；非ECe","田间杂草植株；具体龄级未记录","2022年7月12日及8月9日两次UAV调查；第二次密度沿用首次盐度分区","无人机图斑密度与空间EC类别叠加；非操控性生长试验","Nikolić等在三块田和三个EC类别均记录到本种，部分>4dS\u002Fm区域密度较高；这是空间对应关系，不是处理试验。","EC来自1:2.5土水提取和空间插值，未按单株根区采样；土样深度未报告，第二次调查沿用首次盐度分区。",[147,154,160],{"name_original":148,"display_name":149,"record_id":150,"verification_level":151,"support_scope":152,"source_ids":153},"china_halophyte_catalog","China Halophyte Catalogue","CNHP_0726","archived_synthesis","种级编目；列“新盐生植物”，生境水边沙土地、荒地或田野；“未知，100 mM（推测值）”。条目明确 100mM 为推测；“根据野外调查增补”未给方法\u002F盐值原引文。可解释入库来源及标签；不能把估算盐度当实测，也无自然盐生专性证据。",[28],{"name_original":155,"display_name":156,"record_id":157,"verification_level":151,"support_scope":158,"source_ids":159},"biosalinedb","BiosalineDB","3631","BiosalineDB将苘麻列为路旁、荒地和田野常见杂草，并转述张秀玲（2008）报告≤50 mmol\u002FL NaCl可能促进种子萌发、≥200 mmol\u002FL明显抑制。该种子端点不同于Xiong等（2018）的另一研究；数据库未列种子材料、培养介质和处理时长。“沿海植物”是页面分类，不等同自然滨海盐渍根区。",[84,29],{"name_original":161,"display_name":162,"record_id":163,"verification_level":164,"support_scope":165,"source_ids":166},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","baseline row 7","local_original","欧洲区域生态匹配；盐分指示值0.4，EUNIS盐\u002F半咸生境关联数0。欧洲区域生态数据库指标，不涵盖全球分布。不提供自然盐生正证；低值仅作欧洲生态线索，不据此全球排除。",[167,168],"S7","S8",[170,176,180,188,191,196,203,208],{"id":28,"citation_original":171,"url":172,"additional_urls":173,"source_kind":174,"verification_level":151,"checked_at":175},"中国盐生植物编目，CNHP_0726","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.biodiversity-science.net\u002Ffileup\u002F1005-0094\u002FDATA\u002F2025030.zip",[],"database","2026-09-29",{"id":29,"citation_original":177,"url":178,"additional_urls":179,"source_kind":174,"verification_level":151,"checked_at":175},"BiosalineDB species record 3631, Abutilon theophrasti","https:\u002F\u002Fdb.cngb.org\u002Fbiosaline\u002Fcoastal_plants\u002F?id=3631&lvl=species",[],{"id":30,"citation_original":181,"url":182,"additional_urls":183,"source_kind":185,"verification_level":186,"checked_at":187},"Xiong et al. 2018. Effects of environmental factors on seed germination and emergence of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Planta Daninha 36:e0182352. DOI:10.1590\u002FS0100-83582018360100122","https:\u002F\u002Fpdfs.semanticscholar.org\u002Fba71\u002F02d6ea9d29b70a636526a9e72c8f6d37165c.pdf",[184],"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.scielo.br\u002Fj\u002Fpd\u002Fa\u002FJCNPkHdtB97568KxpS84Pxz\u002F?lang=en","primary_experiment","full_text","2026-10-03",{"id":84,"citation_original":189,"url":178,"additional_urls":190,"source_kind":174,"verification_level":151,"checked_at":175},"张秀玲. 2008. 不同盐胁迫对苘麻种子萌发的影响. 江苏农业科学 1:35–37（BiosalineDB所列）",[],{"id":31,"citation_original":192,"url":193,"additional_urls":194,"source_kind":195,"verification_level":186,"checked_at":187},"Nikolić, N., Cucchiaro, S., Straffelini, E., Tarolli, P. & Masin, R. (2025). Remote sensing assessment of the weed adaptability to soil salinization induced by extreme droughts on coastal agriculture. iScience 28(5):112410. DOI:10.1016\u002Fj.isci.2025.112410.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002Fj.isci.2025.112410",[],"primary_field",{"id":41,"citation_original":197,"url":198,"additional_urls":199,"source_kind":200,"verification_level":201,"checked_at":202},"Plants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Abutilon theophrasti Medik.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:1044174-2",[],"taxonomic_authority","authority_record","2026-10-02",{"id":167,"citation_original":204,"url":205,"additional_urls":206,"source_kind":174,"verification_level":164,"checked_at":202},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[207],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",{"id":168,"citation_original":209,"url":210,"additional_urls":211,"source_kind":174,"verification_level":164,"checked_at":202},"Tichý et al. (2023), Ellenberg-type indicator values for European plants, FloraVeg.EU release v2.0. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.7427088.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.7427088",[212],"https:\u002F\u002Fzenodo.org\u002Fapi\u002Frecords\u002F7427088\u002Ffiles\u002FIndicator.values-tables-2022-11-07-Zenodo.v2.xlsx\u002Fcontent",1792838174741]