[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":245},["ShallowReactive",2],{"flora-8-zh":3},{"release_id":4,"flora_id":5,"display_name":6,"scientific_name":6,"document":7},"thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31",8,"Acacia ampliceps",{"schema_version":8,"language":9,"id":5,"taxonomy":10,"display_name":6,"family_display":14,"genus_display":15,"description":16,"tolerance_evidence":110,"database_records":164,"sources":187},"flora-language-separated-v0.3","zh",{"original_scientific_name":6,"accepted_name":11,"family":12,"genus":13},"Acacia ampliceps Maslin","Fabaceae","Acacia","豆科","金合欢属",{"summary":17,"sections":18},"Acacia ampliceps有澳大利亚盐湖边缘和盐生草地的野外记录，也有苗期盐处理研究。野外种群与试验所用异地种源不同；高浓度短期存活与持续生长是不同的观察端点。",[19,33,43,52,65,73,94,102],{"id":20,"title":21,"paragraphs":22},"s01","概述",[23],{"id":24,"text":25,"source_ids":26,"claim_type":32},"s01-p01","Acacia ampliceps见于澳大利亚北部盐湖边缘和盐生草地；苗期试验显示，盐胁迫下的生长和根瘤表现受接种根瘤菌株影响。各试验的种源和暴露时间不同。",[27,28,29,30,31],"S1","S2","S3","S4","S7","project_synthesis",{"id":34,"title":35,"paragraphs":36},"s02","名称与分类",[37],{"id":38,"text":39,"source_ids":40,"claim_type":42},"s02-p01","Acacia ampliceps Maslin，澳大利亚北部盐湖\u002F泉缘及盐生草地的野生种群；栽培盐试验材料分别来自泰国种子库或试验供种，不能与野外生态记录混作同一来源。",[27,28,41],"S8","source_fact",{"id":44,"title":45,"paragraphs":46},"s03","形态与鉴别",[47],{"id":48,"text":49,"source_ids":50,"claim_type":42},"s03-p01","澳大利亚北部灌木或小乔木，具狭长、常下垂的叶状柄，花序为球形头状、白至乳黄色，荚果扁平。花序颜色、叶状柄和荚果需结合观察；盐地种群记录不构成形态变异的全域描述。",[27,28,51],"S11",{"id":53,"title":54,"paragraphs":55},"s04","分布、生境与物候",[56,60],{"id":57,"text":58,"source_ids":59,"claim_type":42},"s04-p01","西澳Mandora Marsh\u002FWalyarta样方在内陆盐湖平坦区、泉缘盐生灌丛记录该种与Tecticornia、Frankenia及Sporobolus伴生；Eighty-mile Beach湿地资料也记载Salt Wattle出现在盐生草地边缘。另有自然盐地造林\u002F苗期试验和盐胁迫试验。",[27,28,41],{"id":61,"text":62,"source_ids":63,"claim_type":64},"s04-p02","现有资料没有提供可在不同地区间比较的可靠花期或果期；单一地点和园艺材料的记录不足以概括全种物候。",[41],"evidence_gap",{"id":66,"title":67,"paragraphs":68},"s05","自然生境盐分关联",[69],{"id":70,"text":71,"source_ids":72,"claim_type":32},"s05-p01","澳大利亚盐湖边缘、泉缘和盐生草地调查把本种与盐生植物群落共同记录，构成限定区域的野外正证；不能把异地苗木盐处理与每处野外植株直接对应。",[27,28],{"id":74,"title":75,"paragraphs":76},"s06","耐盐研究",[77,81,85,90],{"id":78,"text":79,"source_ids":80,"claim_type":42},"s06-p01","Zou等（1995）将澳大利亚Tree Seed Centre的S15764种源幼苗分别接种耐盐Rhizobium PMA63\u002F1或盐敏Bradyrhizobium PMA37，在灭菌白硅砂中接受0、100和200 mM NaCl处理。施盐始于播种第6周，先以25 mM\u002F日升至100 mM，再以50 mM\u002F日升至200 mM；试验一在播种后第4、6、8、10和12周收获，试验二延至第14周并于第12和14周收获。200 mM下，PMA63\u002F1组受抑较轻；处理4和6周后仍观察到新根瘤形成，其根瘤数下降28%，PMA37组下降74%。研究还测量根瘤、根和地上部干重、植株氮及固氮酶活性，结论限于这一种源—菌株组合。",[30],{"id":82,"text":83,"source_ids":84,"claim_type":42},"s06-p02","泰国来源的25±2 cm幼苗在温室原土盆袋中接受0、200、400或600 mM NaCl土壤溶液处理9天。研究将200 mM列为轻度胁迫、400–600 mM列为高至极端胁迫，并测量生长、离子与渗透调节以及光合指标；600 mM结果反映急性强胁迫，未界定持续生长时限。",[29],{"id":86,"text":87,"source_ids":88,"claim_type":42},"s06-p03","澳大利亚盐敏感性数据库将两项TSS当量与39%和62%的生物量下降相连。数据库所列14周端点可能对应Zou等全文中的重复试验Experiment 2；该试验延至播种后第14周，并在第12和14周收获，而摘要仅概述至第12周。数据库行未指出端点对应的具体试验处理，也未给出TSS当量到原文NaCl剂量的换算。",[89],"S6",{"id":91,"text":92,"source_ids":93,"claim_type":42},"s06-p04","来自Peshawar森林研究所\u002FNIAB供种的3周龄幼苗在半强度Hoagland营养液中培养，移栽1周后开始施盐并在2天内升至目标浓度；移栽8周后测量地上部和根的鲜重、干重及长度。Table 1所列地上部\u002F根干重在100、200和300 mM NaCl下分别为0.63\u002F0.28、0.49\u002F0.22和0.24\u002F0.12 g·株⁻¹；200 mM组终点干重非零，但试验未测初始干重。目标浓度暴露期按时序约为7周，400 mM只有未展示数据的存活描述。",[31],{"id":95,"title":96,"paragraphs":97},"s07","已报道机制与生态适应",[98],{"id":99,"text":100,"source_ids":101,"claim_type":32},"s07-p01","盐处理研究显示接种不同根瘤菌的苗木反应不同，耐盐菌接种组在200 mM处理中生长、根瘤与氮状态受影响较轻。该结果是特定幼苗—共生菌组合，不能推广到全部野外种群。",[27,28,30],{"id":103,"title":104,"paragraphs":105},"s08","研究结论与资料缺口",[106],{"id":107,"text":108,"source_ids":109,"claim_type":32},"s08-p01","Zou等全文的Experiment 2延至播种后第14周，并在第12和14周收获；摘要仅概述至第12周。澳大利亚数据库列出的14周端点可能对应Experiment 2，但数据库行没有说明其具体处理映射，也未给出TSS换算到NaCl剂量的依据。其余盐响应研究的种源、介质和端点各异，不能合并为统一阈值。",[27,28,29,30,89,31],[111,125,138,151],{"id":112,"source_ids":113,"description":114},"M01",[30],{"evidence_type":115,"material":116,"salt_metric":117,"value_and_unit":118,"medium_and_exposure":119,"life_stage":120,"duration":121,"endpoint":122,"result":123,"limitations":124},"苗期NaCl–根瘤菌共生试验","澳大利亚Tree Seed Centre provenance S15764幼苗，接种Rhizobium PMA63\u002F1或Bradyrhizobium PMA37","NaCl","0、100、200 mM NaCl","灭菌白硅砂盆栽；每天过量浇灌基础营养液。播种第6周开始加盐，25 mM\u002F日升至100 mM、再以50 mM\u002F日升至200 mM。","幼苗生长与根瘤共生","试验1在播种后4、6、8、10、12周收获；试验2在第12、14周收获。盐处理开始于第6周。","根瘤数、根瘤\u002F根\u002F地上部干重、植株氮含量和固氮酶活性","200 mM时PMA63\u002F1接种组受盐影响较轻；暴露4和6周后仍观察到新根瘤形成，根瘤数降幅为28%，PMA37组降74%。","结论限于S15764种源及两株根瘤菌构成的特定幼苗共生组合，不能代表所有野外种群。",{"id":126,"source_ids":127,"description":128},"M02",[29],{"evidence_type":129,"material":130,"salt_metric":117,"value_and_unit":131,"medium_and_exposure":132,"life_stage":133,"duration":134,"endpoint":135,"result":136,"limitations":137},"九天NaCl土壤溶液暴露下幼苗生理响应试验","25±2cm幼苗；种子来自泰国农业与合作社部土地发展厅","0、200、400、600 mM NaCl（0 mM为对照）","温室幼苗原土盆袋；论文所称soil solution浓度","幼苗","9天","生长性状；Na、K、Ca；脯氨酸和可溶性糖；光合色素、叶绿素荧光、净光合速率、气孔导度和蒸腾速率","论文将200 mM列为轻度胁迫，将400–600 mM列为高至极端胁迫；600 mM幼苗在处理9天后测定，属于短期强胁迫结果。","处理为急性9天暴露，浓度设定在土壤溶液中；研究未报告这些浓度下的持续生长周期。",{"id":139,"source_ids":140,"description":141},"M03",[89],{"evidence_type":142,"material":143,"salt_metric":144,"value_and_unit":145,"medium_and_exposure":146,"life_stage":133,"duration":147,"endpoint":148,"result":149,"limitations":150},"澳大利亚盐敏感性数据库生物量下降记录","六周龄幼苗（数据记录）；关联Zou et al. 1995 reference 109","未知","5845、11700 mg\u002FL（数据库称TSS equivalents）","AUSALT-1272条目未说明试验介质或测定体系；其中reference 109指向Zou等研究，但该行数值与该研究具体试验的对应关系仍不确定。","数据库列14周端点。Zou等全文说明实验1在播种后第4、6、8、10、12周收获，重复试验Experiment 2延至第14周并在第12、14周收获；数据库行未指出该端点对应哪一项具体处理。","生物量下降","数据库列出5,845和11,700 mg\u002FL TSS当量下生物量分别下降39%和62%；该行没有把这两个TSS当量对应到Zou等原文的NaCl剂量。","AUSALT-1272以TSS当量表示mg\u002FL，目录行未说明处理介质或换算方法。Zou等全文显示Experiment 2延至第14周，但目录行未将14周端点对应到具体处理；该行也没有提供TSS当量与0、100、200 mM NaCl处理之间的换算。",{"id":152,"source_ids":153,"description":154},"M04",[31],{"evidence_type":155,"material":156,"salt_metric":117,"value_and_unit":157,"medium_and_exposure":158,"life_stage":159,"duration":160,"endpoint":161,"result":162,"limitations":163},"半强度Hoagland水培下八周NaCl幼苗生长试验","Acacia ampliceps 3周龄幼苗；种子来自Peshawar森林研究所\u002FNIAB供种，非野外盐生种群材料","100、200、300 mM NaCl","半强度Hoagland营养液水培；25 L槽，盐液每周更换","幼苗生长","移栽后8周收获；移栽1周后开始加盐，2日递增到目标浓度，故终浓度期约7周（按原方法推算）","收获时shoot\u002Froot鲜重、干重、长度；持续培养生长端点","Table 1列出地上部\u002F根干重：100 mM为0.63\u002F0.28 g·株⁻¹，200 mM为0.49\u002F0.22 g·株⁻¹，300 mM为0.24\u002F0.12 g·株⁻¹。200 mM组有非零终点干重，但作者未报告处理前初始干重。400 mM仅有未展示数据的存活描述，不纳入生长测量。","作者未报告处理前初始干重。结论依据完整8周苗期试验、每周更换目标营养液及处理组和对照组的终点生长指标；目标浓度期约7周由处理时序推算，不代表全生活史耐受或野外根区浓度。",[165,174,179],{"name_original":166,"display_name":167,"record_id":168,"verification_level":169,"support_scope":170,"source_ids":171},"ehaloph","eHALOPH","11997","archived_synthesis","种级eHALOPH记录的max_salinity列300 mM、600 mM及60.9 dS\u002Fm，最适值为0和200 mM；备注将600 mM归于Theerawitaya等（2015），并提及Abbas（2013），关联refs 6398\u002F6776\u002F6462等。600 mM对应9天幼苗暴露；Zou等（1995）报告200 mM下的持续苗期响应。其他数值的具体来源条件尚未明确，且不同dS\u002Fm测量体系与NaCl浓度不能直接合并。600 mM是急性试验中的处理浓度，未确定该浓度下的持续生长。",[172,173,29,31],"S5","S9",{"name_original":175,"display_name":175,"record_id":176,"verification_level":169,"support_scope":177,"source_ids":178},"australian_salt_sensitivity","AUSALT-1272","澳大利亚盐敏感性数据库的种名级记录列六周龄幼苗、5,845 mg\u002FL下39%生物量下降、11,700 mg\u002FL下62%生物量下降及14周端点；数据域包括澳大利亚水生\u002F淡水以及盐湖、河口记录。方法文件将盐度表示为TSS当量，reference no. 109指向Zou、Dart与Marcar（1995）。该论文的Experiment 2延至第14周；数据库行未将14周端点对应到具体处理，也未提供TSS当量与NaCl剂量的换算，因此该记录是同一研究链的二次转录，不是独立证据。",[89],{"name_original":180,"display_name":181,"record_id":182,"verification_level":183,"support_scope":184,"source_ids":185},"floraveg","FloraVeg.EU","baseline row 8","local_original","FloraVeg.EU名称查询返回未匹配候选项，未列盐性或半咸水EUNIS关联。这一欧洲数据库覆盖缺项不否定澳大利亚野外样方记录。",[186],"S10",[188,194,199,206,211,215,220,224,230,234,239],{"id":27,"citation_original":189,"url":190,"additional_urls":191,"source_kind":192,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":193},"Department of Parks and Wildlife. 2015. Mandora Marsh \u002F Walyarta Flora and Floristic Vegetation Survey","https:\u002F\u002Flibrary.dbca.wa.gov.au\u002FFullTextFiles\u002F072159.pdf",[],"primary_field","2026-09-29",{"id":28,"citation_original":195,"url":196,"additional_urls":197,"source_kind":198,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":193},"Department of Conservation and Land Management. 2003. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands: Eighty-mile Beach, Western Australia","https:\u002F\u002Flibrary.dbca.wa.gov.au\u002FFullTextFiles\u002F070698.pdf",[],"authoritative_flora",{"id":29,"citation_original":200,"url":201,"additional_urls":202,"source_kind":203,"verification_level":204,"checked_at":205},"Theerawitaya et al. 2015. Physio-biochemical and morphological characters of halophyte legume shrub, Acacia ampliceps seedlings in response to salt stress under greenhouse. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:630. DOI:10.3389\u002Ffpls.2015.00630","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.frontiersin.org\u002Fjournals\u002Fplant-science\u002Farticles\u002F10.3389\u002Ffpls.2015.00630\u002Ffull",[],"primary_experiment","full_text","2026-10-02",{"id":30,"citation_original":207,"url":208,"additional_urls":209,"source_kind":203,"verification_level":183,"checked_at":210},"Zou, Dart & Marcar. 1995. Interaction of salinity and rhizobial strain on growth and N2-fixation by Acacia ampliceps. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27(4–5):409–413. DOI:10.1016\u002F0038-0717(95)98611-Q","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.sciencedirect.com\u002Fscience\u002Farticle\u002Fpii\u002F003807179598611Q",[],"2026-10-04",{"id":172,"citation_original":212,"url":213,"additional_urls":214,"source_kind":192,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":193},"Shirazi et al. 2006. Growth performance and nutrient contents of some salt tolerant multipurpose tree species growing under saline environment","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.pakbs.org\u002Fpjbot\u002FPDFs\u002F38(5)\u002FPJB38(5)1381.pdf",[],{"id":89,"citation_original":216,"url":217,"additional_urls":218,"source_kind":219,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":193},"Australian salt sensitivity database, record AUSALT-1272; linked reference 109: Zou N., Dart P.J. & Marcar N.E. (1995), “Interaction of salinity and rhizobial strain on growth and N2-fixation by Acacia ampliceps”, Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27(4–5):409–413. DOI:10.1016\u002F0038-0717(95)98611-Q.","https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.1016\u002F0038-0717(95)98611-Q",[],"database",{"id":31,"citation_original":221,"url":222,"additional_urls":223,"source_kind":203,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":193},"Abbas, G., Saqib, M., Akhtar, J. & Basra, S.M.A. (2013). Salinity tolerance potential of two Acacia species at early seedling stage. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 50(4):683–688.","https:\u002F\u002Fpakjas.com.pk\u002Fpapers\u002F2225.pdf",[],{"id":41,"citation_original":225,"url":226,"additional_urls":227,"source_kind":228,"verification_level":229,"checked_at":205},"Plants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Acacia ampliceps Maslin.","https:\u002F\u002Fpowo.science.kew.org\u002Ftaxon\u002Furn:lsid:ipni.org:names:469702-1",[],"taxonomic_authority","authority_record",{"id":173,"citation_original":231,"url":232,"additional_urls":233,"source_kind":219,"verification_level":169,"checked_at":205},"eHALOPH species record 11997, Acacia ampliceps","https:\u002F\u002Fehaloph.uc.pt\u002Fshowplant\u002F11997",[],{"id":186,"citation_original":235,"url":236,"additional_urls":237,"source_kind":219,"verification_level":183,"checked_at":205},"FloraVeg.EU \u002F Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736.","https:\u002F\u002Ffiles.ibot.cas.cz\u002Fcevs\u002Fdownloads\u002Ffloraveg\u002FCharacteristic-species-combinations-EUNIS-habitats-2021-06-01.xlsx",[238],"https:\u002F\u002Fdoi.org\u002F10.5281\u002Fzenodo.4812736",{"id":51,"citation_original":240,"url":241,"additional_urls":242,"source_kind":198,"verification_level":243,"checked_at":244},"Government of Australia. Flora of Australia, WATTLE: Acacia ampliceps Maslin species factsheet (derived from Flora of Australia volumes 11A, 11B and 12).","https:\u002F\u002Fapps.lucidcentral.org\u002Fwattle\u002Ftext\u002Fentities\u002Facacia_ampliceps.htm",[],"search_excerpt","2026-10-03",1792838174785]