Flora account
Overview
Acacia cyclops is an evergreen shrub of coastal scrub and dunes in Western and South Australia. In Craig et al.’s 12-week mixed-salt irrigation trial with saltland-source seedlings, survival was 100% at a final ECw of 9500 mS/m under salinity alone; weekly height measurements also showed slower growth as salinity increased. [S1, S2, S3, S93]
Names and classification
Acacia cyclops A.Cunn. ex G.Don. Craig et al. tested seedlings sourced from saline land in Western Australia; records of coastal dunes, scrub and salt-spray exposure describe habitats and do not place every population in saline root-zone soil. [S1, S3, S93]
POWO accepts Acacia cyclops A.Cunn. ex G.Don. The Craig et al. experiment is interpreted using the material and provenance reported in the paper. [S3, S93]
Morphology and identification
A coastal shrub whose adult leaves are mainly flattened phyllodes; its yellow flowers form globose heads, and mature seeds bear a conspicuous red aril. Fruit and seed characters can aid identification, but cultivated or naturalized plants should not be identified from locality alone. [S92]
Distribution, habitat and phenology
The Flora of Australia records the species from coastal scrub, sandy ground and dunes, and notes salt-spray tolerance; Craig et al. collected plants from naturally saline sites for a seedling trial. VicFlora also records naturalisation in South Africa, which does not describe the species' native Australian ecology. [S1, S2, S3, S93]
The available sources do not provide a flowering or fruiting season that can be corroborated across regions. [S93]
Salinity in natural habitats
Craig et al.’s material came from naturally saline sites in Western Australia, and the paper reports soil salinity at the collection sites. Coastal dunes and salt-spray exposure differ from salt-marsh root-zone conditions; the South African record is from an introduced range. [S1, S3]
Salinity studies
Craig et al. tested 3-month-old, nodulated seedlings sourced from Western Australia for 12 weeks. NaCl, MgSO4 and CaCl2 were mixed at a 16:3:1 molar ratio and increased weekly; the salinity-only irrigation reached a maximum ECw of 9500 mS/m, at which A. cyclops survival was 100%. The study also measured height weekly and shoot dry mass at harvest: height continued to increase through ECw of 7000 mS/m, with smaller increments at higher salinity. Mortality was higher in the separate salinity-plus-waterlogging treatment. [S1]
Craig et al.’s Table 2 reports source-site soil ECe by taxon. At the A. cyclops collection site, the 0–50 mm layer measured 6510, 80 and 130 mS/m in spring 1984, spring 1986 and autumn 1987, respectively; corresponding values for 200–400 mm were 2690, 80 and 400 mS/m, and for 400–600 mm were 4840, 260 and 1950 mS/m. Salinity at this site varied greatly by sampling year and depth; these values describe provenance, not seedling treatment concentrations. [S1]
eHALOPH transcribes Craig et al.’s 9500 mS/m ECw as 9.5 dS/m, but the correct conversion is 95 dS/m; the two values are not equivalent. The database also lists 9.7 dS/m linked to AbouDeya 1995, whose species-level material, methods and measurement metric have not been verified. [S2]
Reported mechanisms and ecological adaptations
Direct endpoints include survival, height and shoot dry matter, and the study shows that salinity and waterlogging jointly affect seedling performance. It did not test reproduction in mature plants or the full life cycle. [S1, S3]
Conclusions and evidence gaps
A. cyclops seedlings had 100% survival after 12 weeks of saline irrigation at a final ECw of 9500 mS/m, while weekly height measurements showed slower growth at higher salinity; this seedling trial does not address reproduction in mature plants. Craig et al.’s Table 2 also reports source-site ECe for this species, with large variation among years and depths. eHALOPH's conversion of 9500 mS/m to 9.5 dS/m is tenfold too low, and the measurement conditions behind its separate 9.7 dS/m entry remain unresolved. [S1, S2, S3, S4, S93]
Salinity research · Evidence records
3Materials, original units, exposure durations and limitations are retained. These records do not form a single tolerance threshold.
- Material
- Three-month-old nodulated seedlings from Western Australian saltland provenance
- Salinity metric
- Mixed salts of NaCl:MgSO4:CaCl2 at a 16:3:1 molar ratio; irrigation-water ECw
- Treatment / value and unit
- Final irrigation-water ECw 9500 mS/m
- Medium and exposure
- Saline irrigation increased weekly; salinity-only treatment reached ECw 9500 mS/m; a separate treatment combined salinity with waterlogging
- Life stage
- Seedlings
- Duration
- 12 weeks
- Measured endpoint
- Survival, weekly height increments and shoot dry mass at harvest
- Result
- A. cyclops survival was 100% in the salinity-only treatment at a final ECw of 9500 mS/m; height continued to increase through ECw of 7000 mS/m, with smaller increments above that level; mortality increased when salinity was combined with waterlogging.
- Scope and limitations
- Seedling material was 3 months old and nodulated; survival, height and shoot dry mass do not establish mature-plant reproduction or full-life-cycle performance; ECw is irrigation-water electrical conductivity.
- Material
- A. cyclops collection site in Western Australia; no experimental plants were treated in this measurement
- Salinity metric
- Mixed salts in natural source soils
- Treatment / value and unit
- 0–50 mm: 6510, 80 and 130 mS/m (spring 1984, spring 1986 and autumn 1987); 200–400 mm: 2690, 80 and 400 mS/m; 400–600 mm: 4840, 260 and 1950 mS/m
- Medium and exposure
- Saturated-paste extract of Western Australian saltland soils; sampled at 0–600 mm depth
- Life stage
- Source habitat
- Duration
- Sampling context; no treatment period
- Measured endpoint
- Electrical conductivity of saturated-paste extracts (ECe) at the source site, measured by depth and sampling season
- Result
- Table 2 reports values for the A. cyclops collection site and shows large differences among sampling years and soil depths.
- Scope and limitations
- These values describe the field provenance; they are neither seedling treatment concentrations nor measurements paired with individual plants.
- Material
- Experimental material and taxonomic identification not verified
- Salinity metric
- Not specified
- Treatment / value and unit
- 9.7 dS/m (database value as displayed)
- Medium and exposure
- eHALOPH field linked to AbouDeya 1995; method and medium unresolved
- Life stage
- Unspecified
- Duration
- Unspecified
- Measured endpoint
- Database maximum-test-value field
- Result
- eHALOPH lists Craig et al.’s 9500 mS/m ECw as 9.5 dS/m, but the correct conversion is 95 dS/m; its separate 9.7 dS/m entry links to AbouDeya 1995, whose original species-level conditions remain unchecked.
- Scope and limitations
- The database identifies a literature trail, but neither 9.5 nor 9.7 dS/m is a verified salt-treatment threshold for this species; 9.5 differs from Craig’s reported value by a tenfold conversion error.
Linked database records
Database indexing is presented separately from original research evidence.
eHALOPH 11999
eHALOPH lists a final ECw of 9500 mS/m from Craig et al.’s salinity-only treatment as 9.5 dS/m; the correct conversion is 95 dS/m. It also lists 9.7 dS/m linked to AbouDeya 1995, whose conditions remain unchecked. The record includes coastal habitat notes but does not distinguish salt spray from saline root-zone soil. [S2, S4]
FloraVeg.EU baseline row 11
Exact-name European match in FloraVeg.EU; no saline or brackish EUNIS association was recorded. The regional database does not describe native Australian or introduced South African populations. [S94]
Literature & sources
7Source IDs are local to this species and content version.
Craig, G.F., D.T. Bell & C.A. Atkins. 1990. Response to salt and waterlogging stress of 10 taxa of Acacia selected from naturally saline areas of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 38(6):619–630. DOI:10.1071/BT9900619
View original sourceeHALOPH species record 11999
View original sourceGovernment of Australia. Flora of Australia, Acacia cyclops species account
View original sourceSauer. 1965. Geographic reconnaissance of Western Australian Seashore vegetation(eHALOPH所列参考)
View original sourceVicFlora, Acacia cyclops
View original sourcePlants of the World Online (POWO), Kew Science. Acacia cyclops A.Cunn. ex G.Don.
View original sourceFloraVeg.EU / Chytrý et al. (2020), EUNIS-ESy characteristic-species combinations, version 2021-06-01. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4812736.
View original source https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4812736thrive-v1-9d751b6f6d1787853e7f8e31

